D&D 5E Spell-less ranger 2/fighter(battlemaster) 3 question??

[TheLoneRanger1979]

.... I don't think the MC rules are there to try and make a more 'powerful' class combo like folks were apt to do with 3.x/PF. I believe the MC rules are there for players and DM's who wanted an option to make characters that didn't quite fit into a class/archtype that is in the game. For example, a cleric of the god of assassins would be perfect for MC'ing Cleric(Tickery) and Thief(Assassin). But taking two of the same type of class in hopes of somehow "gaming the system" is not the intent of the MC rules, IMHO.....

Pretty much this. Also, the UA Spell less ranger variant (AKA Aragorn) is already a hybrid or a MC of its own, specifically designed to address the issue of not having to MC to play that particular archetype. As such, if i was a DM, i would specifically prohibit using the class for MC-ing. I would probably do the same for the UA Spiritual Path ranger.