Actually if the staves required two hands to use as an implement then that would in fact be a rule denying them the use of staves as an implement.
Incorrect. Small characters are only prevented from using two-handed or versatile weapons. Weapon has a very specific definition in 4E, and Implements are separate from Weapons.
Incorrect. Small characters are only prevented from using two-handed or versatile weapons. Weapon has a very specific definition in 4E, and Implements are separate from Weapons.
That was basically my point in a nutshell.Incorrect. Small characters are only prevented from using two-handed or versatile weapons. Weapon has a very specific definition in 4E, and Implements are separate from Weapons.
Except:
If a player says to me "Can my dwarf have a sharpened battle-shovel?" I can say "Sure - treat it as a battleaxe." That doesn't mean it looks like a battleaxe 'on camera'; but as far as game mechanics are concerned, it behaves as a battleaxe. For interactions with feats, powers, attack rolls, etc, it's a battleaxe in all but name.
-Hyp.
I would have thought that if Halflings were barred from using the Staff as an Implement, it would have been stated somewhere. Being that it is not, and therefore Halflings can indeed wield the Staff as an Implement (even though it can also be used as a quarterstaff, but a quarterstaff itself cannot be wielded by a Halfling), then that would lead me to believe that wielding a Staff Implement is not quite the same as wielding a quarterstaff in the normal two-handed offensive manner.
You don't need to be armed to flank in 4e... but I will grant that an OA with a staff isslightlybetter than an unarmed OA (treated as an improvised weapon).