I'm still utterly baffled by this whole "Mary Sue" criticism. I really am.
So, what is it? Is it because she has more screen time? Or that in the first season most of the plots placed her at the center? That's not a Mary Sue, that's just a protagonist.
It would really strengthen people's criticisms if they could avoid using such loaded shorthand that really doesn't apply here.
Agree with previous comment about the captains being the most interesting characters.
Seriously?
Let us look at Deep Space 9 since you're currently watching that. Sisko is awesome, but is he REALLY the most interesting character?
What about Voyager? You're saying Janeway topped and/or the Doctor or Borg in interest?
The comment was about the Discovery captains.
Is it because she's the focus of much of the show, whereas previous Star Treks focused so much attention on the captains?
Apologies, I thought you were referring to Hussar's comment about previous Treks, where the Captains were the most interesting as seen in his quote below.
All good. DS9 has to many great characters. Odo, Garak, Nog, Ferengi in general. Loving it.
Yeah, the characters were written well (from what I have seen). I'm a few seasons behind you but the show still holds up well. It doesn't have the slick beautiful set and clothing gear of Discovery but what it lacks in budget, it more than makes up for in the writing.
Seriously?
Let us look at Deep Space 9 since you're currently watching that. Sisko is awesome, but is he REALLY the most interesting character?
What about Voyager? You're saying Janeway topped the Doctor and/or Borg in interest? REALLY?

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.