This is my frustration with streaming services in general, and what they've done to the entertainment landscape*. Competition can bring out the best in content creators, or it can make them dash madly at anything (anything) that is good enough to go alongside something good in a listing (that at least some people will tune into, and regardless it makes the service seem like a good deal, what with all the options).
*Yes, yes, I know-this is the same thing that cable did to network TV 30 year earlier
I don't think that is accurate. I think that there are two countervailing forces at work.
The first is that competition is continuing to breed quality. While you might prefer 30-50 yr. old Britcoms, I personally think it is inarguable that the time period from 1999 - present is inarguably the "Golden Age" of TV. Why 1999? That's the first episode of the Sopranos, and also happens to be "peak" Buffy (season 3). It's a good demarcation.
Was there good tv before? Yes! Has there been a lot of crud since? Indubitably! But by any measure, the sheer quantity of quality programming has increased by massive amounts. I would argue that the majority of programs that people think of as "mediocre" today would probably be viewed as the best programs of the 70s, 80s, and 90s. At a certain point, most people can't come close to keeping up with the volume of quality programming that's coming out. It's too much, too fast, and a lot of it just blows by you.
You want to have a life, right? I'll show you- here's a list of five amazing shows. How many have you watched?
The Americans
The Patriot
Halt And Catch Fire
Rectify
The Leftovers
2? 3? None? Heck, we constantly see quality shows dropped (
Station Eleven) that barely generate a ripple - there's just too much stuff out there. We've never had it better when it comes to the quality of programming.
But....
There's another factor at work. Call it ... Zaslav effect. The prestige model? That's very .... last year. Very "HBO." Very "drive people to pay for a subscription." The new hotness is "keep people to have your shows on in the background while you do other stuff and ads play." And for that, you don't want programming that is all intellectual and taxing and requires you to ... actively watch. Instead, you want low-cost, low-engagement programming that is just filling time and has a lot of room for ads. As we move to tiered services, expect to see more of this.