Patryn of Elvenshae
First Post
Goolpsy said:another thing is, Why use a broken ruleset like 3.5 is ..?
Aren't you amusing!
Goolpsy said:another thing is, Why use a broken ruleset like 3.5 is ..?
Goolpsy said:Sundering isn't that powerful, first of all, dont send npc only at the players... "try sundering a kraken".. another thing is, Why use a broken ruleset like 3.5 is ..?
Goolpsy said:In 3.0 you cant sunder a weapon with a higher Magic bonus
= +5 sword > +1 adamatine, +5 sword > +1holy keen flaming burst.
another thing is, Why use a broken ruleset like 3.5 is ..?
Firestorm said:Per the DMG pg. 222 under the heading Hardness and Hit Points "An attacker cannot damage a magic weapon that has an enhancement bonus unless his own weapon has at least as high an enhancement bonus as the weapon or shield struck."
Firestorm said:That page# and quote is from the 3.5 DMG.
Firestorm said:That page# and quote is from the 3.5 DMG.
3.5 DMG Errata said:Hardness and Hit Points
Dungeon Master’s Guide, page 222
Problem: The first paragraph is not consistent with similar information for shields on page 217.
Solution: Delete the first sentence after the boldface header. Change the next sentence to read as follows:
Each +1 of enhancement bonus adds 2 to a weapon’s or shield’s hardness and +10 to its hit points.