again... if the majority of gamers are cis white males... then we have to pick sides. When some % of X says they want A and another % of X want B... we are the outsiders looking in. We are the ones that then have to decide how to be a good alley to X. The problem is how do we that are NOT X decide what is or isn't right? By themselves even a unified minority is just that, a minority. So they need allies in the majority. The problem lies with how do we try to fret out "Is this hostel or is that sub group of X over reaching" Harder still isBut not to trample pointlessly long on semantics, the issue I am seeing is that it doesn't hold water if anyone says something like "I am X and I don't like this" and that is taken to mean "this is hostile to X people". Which is how I see a lot of discourse about inclusiveness and hostility taking place.
When someone in the Majority tells you "This minority wants X" and then someone in the minority tell you "No we want Y" and that original person from the majority shows some % of the minority wants X... and that member of the minority shows that some % want Y... now what?