The fact that the poster in question hasn’t been booted off the site is a constant source of amazement.I bit late on this one, but I'd like to think that if your company publishes RPG material based on non-white mythologies written by The RPG Pundit then maybe you don't get to have your definition of what is or isn't racist taken seriously.
It's popular so it sucks?And we’re back to the perennial favorite appeal to popularity. “It’s popular therefore it must be good.” No. That’s not how any of this works.
No, that would be another fallacy.It's popular so it sucks?
I don't think I'd go that far; quality can certainly be a factor in popularity, and in a broad sense, probably sets a floor on quality (i.e. there's only so bad a really popular thing can be from the perspective of the general market unless the market is completely closed).No, that would be another fallacy.
Popularity or lack thereof has zero bearing on something’s quality or lack thereof.
Sure. Maybe a factor among many.I don't think I'd go that far; quality can certainly be a factor in popularity, and in a broad sense,
I wouldn't go that far.probably sets a floor on quality (i.e. there's only so bad a really popular thing can be from the perspective of the general market unless the market is completely closed).
I'd revise that to "any indicator" but broadly, yes...there are many other factors in play.What it doesn't do is give you a strong indicator in either direction; there are too many other factors in play.
Sure. Maybe a factor among many.
I wouldn't go that far.
I'd revise that to "any indicator" but broadly, yes...there are many other factors in play.
I know right? And they're among the first to cry foul when they get called out for it.I'd like to think that if your company publishes RPG material based on non-white mythologies written by The RPG Pundit then maybe you don't get to have your definition of what is or isn't racist taken seriously.