A pineapple peepzza.I'll just leave this alliterative little brain worm here, and sit back to revel in the wailing and gnashing of teeth...
Peeps and pineapple on a pizza.
A pineapple peepzza.I'll just leave this alliterative little brain worm here, and sit back to revel in the wailing and gnashing of teeth...
Peeps and pineapple on a pizza.
Throw on some candy corn, with a chocolate based sauce....I'll just leave this alliterative little brain worm here, and sit back to revel in the wailing and gnashing of teeth...
Peeps and pineapple on a pizza.
I'm with you on the pineapple pizza, but I knew candy corn was garbage before the internet was even a thing.feel the same way about candy corn, too. It's not that bad, people only hate it because Twitter told them to.
Only somebody who thinks candy corn is "the best" would use the phrase "totally dope" lolCandy corn is literally the best.
It's Baked honey, it's totally dope.
Only a Sith speaks in absolutes. Don't be whack, that's hella messed up.Only somebody who thinks candy corn is "the best" would use the phrase "totally dope" lol
I am constantly disgusted by the vitriol people employ when attacking fictional characters for their supposed crimes against equally fictional characters.I am constantly bemused by the lengths people will go to defend fictional characters.
Oh no. I meant bemused. Not amused about it at all. I find it endlessly confusing to be honest. I can't imagine being that invested in a fictional character that I would ever go to the lengths that I see people go to to "prove" that their fictional character isn't all that bad. Whether it's endlessly claiming that Belkar from Order of the Stick wasn't evil or now Wanda Maximoff isn't really a villain, just misunderstood, I do find it bemusing, baffling and frankly, just a teensy bit frightening that people would get so invested in a character that no matter the evidence to the contrary, that character can never, ever be seen as a villain or bad.I am constantly disgusted by the vitriol people employ when attacking fictional characters for their supposed crimes against equally fictional characters.
Also, bemused means "confused", not "amused", which is what you clearly meant.
My apologies, then. It's a shame that your attempts to express this confusion are indistinguishable from attempts to provoke the anger of those who do become so invested, out of amusement at their frustration.Oh no. I meant bemused. Not amused about it at all. I find it endlessly confusing to be honest. I can't imagine being that invested in a fictional character that I would ever go to the lengths that I see people go to to "prove" that their fictional character isn't all that bad. Whether it's endlessly claiming that Belkar from Order of the Stick wasn't evil or now Wanda Maximoff isn't really a villain, just misunderstood, I do find it bemusing, baffling and frankly, just a teensy bit frightening that people would get so invested in a character that no matter the evidence to the contrary, that character can never, ever be seen as a villain or bad.
So, no, I didn't not "clearly" mean amused at all. I don't think it's amusing in the slightest.