I was once on a forum on which one particular poster would break a relatively short post down into individual bits, then write a paragraph or more of rebuttal to each. Seriously; sometimes this guy would break up a single sentence to argue as if there were separate points in it.
It shouldn't, if used with sensible moderation. I see it as more like posting walls of text with no paragraph breaks. It's technically OK, but really annoying if you go overboard with it.I thought breaking up posts was akin to trolling
This guy was breaking up several sentences in order to respond to each of them, individually and differently, when they were part of a single coherent thought.It shouldn't, if used with sensible moderation. I see it as more like posting walls of text with no paragraph breaks. It's technically OK, but really annoying if you go overboard with it.
Breaking up posts to direct responses to a particular point can be helpful if done well.
So he was the poster boy for using the practice immoderately.This guy was breaking up several sentences in order to respond to each of them, individually and differently, when they were part of a single coherent thought.
As I said, even breaking up single sentences. That's pretty extreme.Yes, it's the doing it too much, and having too many breaks, as well as often posting with multiple tangents.
That is totally doing it. I remember years ago, watching people troll on the myspace forums, some of it was like an art form, esp in the religion and philosophy, or politics subforums.As I said, even breaking up single sentences. That's pretty extreme.
Im sure at the end, whatever theory you had, will be proven absolutely correct.I have at least two more "True/False" poll statements lined up for tomorrow and the day after, and plan to continue to post them daily as the inspiration strikes.
Do I have a secret agenda with these posts?
![]()