Ryujin
Legend
What's worse: Dealing with a situation in a timely manner, of waiting until it lands on the desk of the CIO?What's worse - dealing with the calls, or dealing with the higher ups who are not motivated to address the issue?

What's worse: Dealing with a situation in a timely manner, of waiting until it lands on the desk of the CIO?What's worse - dealing with the calls, or dealing with the higher ups who are not motivated to address the issue?
ahem... That was Flanders' Mom, talking to the Dr. Foster in "Hurricane Neddy," Season 8 Episode 161. "You gotta help us, Doc. We've tried nothin' and we're all out of ideas."To quote Homer Simpson, "I've done nothing and I'm all out of ideas!"
Please forgive me. It's been a whileahem... That was Flanders' Mom, talking to the Dr. Foster in "Hurricane Neddy," Season 8 Episode 161. "You gotta help us, Doc. We've tried nothin' and we're all out of ideas."
In Canada, schools run like schools. If we procrastinate on something then it could mean that a class doesn't get taught. Unfortunately, my group (End User Computing) tends to be a dumping ground for when the helpdesk doesn't know who does a particular thing, or the people who actually do the thing can't be bothered to do all of the leg work that's required to qualify the issue.Look, schools are run like corporations now, and in corporate IT, procrastination is great! It frees up your day, and now you have activities for tomorrow! In corporate IT, you open a trouble ticket for, say, a printer issue, and the very first response, the first one, is, "Is this working now? Can I close the ticket?" Like, sir or ma'am, you have done nothing. I have done nothing. And the printer, well, it is still doing nothing...
My group gets all of the questions because we (stupidly) actually respond to each email, and each ticket. We even answer the phones!Unfortunately, my group (End User Computing) tends to be a dumping ground for when the helpdesk doesn't know who does a particular thing, or the people who actually do the thing can't be bothered to do all of the leg work that's required to qualify the issue.
My director created a similar group, but only gave internal staff access to it. No one uses it, because no one wants to listen to this director prattle on for a half an hour about something that in no way impacts our function. Having to sit through weekly meetings that he generally makes a half an hour longer than necessary is bad enough.At my workplace, some Galaxy Brain Executive decided to create a "Rapid Response Team" chat group, to which every group has been added. The idea is, this is a way to escalate issues directly to the responsible team, without waiting for people to respond to trouble tickets in the Ticketing System (which is how you're supposed to do it, but, you know, people procrastinate). So now, my desktop is pinging every few minutes with a new person, screaming into the Void for help. It's basically like herding the entire company into an auditorium and asking everybody to shout out their issues, all at once...
Same, though I have taken to making all of my communications via verifiable text (either email or our trouble ticket system), because someone has tried to throw me under the bus far too many times.My group gets all of the questions because we (stupidly) actually respond to each email, and each ticket. We even answer the phones!
What's worse: Dealing with a situation in a timely manner, of waiting until it lands on the desk of the CIO?![]()
My department has about 250 employees and handles the majority of IT work for the university. The CIO is the top of our food chain, within the department. I started there over 20 years ago, when the CIO was a manager for one of the sub-groups. He's hands-on.That's a question that can only be answered in the context of your organization. I can only speak to "typical" organizations, for some value of "typical".
C-level execs don't usually come down on low level employees (like the ones who take the calls at the help desk) - they come down on department heads. And, it isn't typically the job of the people who take calls to push their superiors to get work done. That isn't what they are paid for. The phrase "above their pay grade" generally applies.
Under what conditions is the person actually taking the calls going to take on extra labor trying to manage upwards to save their department head grief? Only when that department head has earned a great deal of goodwill with their department. Such a department head is likely the sort who was on top of things, such that they wouldn't need the phone techs to take on work to save them.