The "I Didn't Comment in Another Thread" Thread

[dragoner]

You mean how a dual-classed monk bard gnome was way better in 3.5 over 4e? The game has lost all meaning!

 

[Ryujin]

You mean how a dual-classed monk bard gnome was way better in 3.5 over 4e? The game has lost all meaning!

In my world I would make an alignment requirement that Bards be non-Lawful. Chaos preferred.

 

[CleverNickName]

I'm just waiting for the Pun Pun references to come out.

"If you take this one specific race, and combine it with this one specific class, and then take this series of very specific feats, and then beg your DM to let you equip this one particular magic item, you'll get to cast this one spell, which will let you do this one specific thing every now and then...and it'll totally break the game! DON'T YOU SEE?! THE 5E RULES ARE ALL COMPLETELY AWFUL!!"

 

[overgeeked]

“The point, you have missed.” —Yoda

 

[trappedslider]

“The point, you have missed.” —Yoda

Wisdom has been cashing you, but you've always been faster

 

[trappedslider]

uh-oh

 

[prabe]

Wow. If all those people are agreeing about what's wrong (if not necessarily why) you done screwed up badly.

 

[trappedslider]

 

[Scribe]

This site is exhausting.

Why cant a fighter be a fighter? It doesnt need to be some 'epic mythical hero running on water in full plate'.

Make a different class for that, or put it down to gear.

PS: Nerf the wizards, they should be Raistlin. Weak, frail, and need to plan ahead.

There is a lot that PF2 does right.

 

[CleverNickName]

The thing I've learned is to be extremely wary of anyone (here on EN World, or elsewhere on Reddit or WotC) who tells you what you should prefer, or what you should consider a problem, or what you need to fix. They don't know you. Odds are, they don't know what they're talking about either.