Rel
Liquid Awesome
I'm not terribly worked up about any aspect of this but I don't see the paper as having done anything wrong or being in violation of "journalistic integrity". I know that I myself could read pretty well by the time I was 4 to 5 years old and certainly was capable of reading most of the words in a news article by the time I was 6 or 7. If the paper publishes the story from a purely factual standpoint then aren't they guilty of the same sin as the teacher? By writing it the way they did they got the point across while steering clear of any accusations of "messing up Santa" for kids that might have read the story.
From a journalism standpoint, this is hardly noteworthy since the local nightly news constantly has references in their newscasts to the effect that "the weather will be (good/bad/ugly) for Santa and the reindeer on Christmas Eve" and crap like that.
From a journalism standpoint, this is hardly noteworthy since the local nightly news constantly has references in their newscasts to the effect that "the weather will be (good/bad/ugly) for Santa and the reindeer on Christmas Eve" and crap like that.