D&D 5E (2014) Todd Kenreck Interview, Crawford Teases Hobgoblin News

Absolutely. So that invites speculation. What settings for D&D or MtG make sense to highlight Hobgoblins by themselves, or for Goblinoids to play a central role generally?

Remembering, always, that they aren’t bound to canon, and many MtG settings could stand some expansion.

I’d say Hobs are a great fit for either Kamigawa or Dominaria, but also I could see some retconning of a classic setting to give hobs or goblinoids generally a more central and/or heroic role.

If it’s Kamigawa, they may be threading a very narrow needle with Hobgoblins, but we will see.
Hobgoblins as such do not have a particularly big history. A real Wildcard from Kamigawa, though? The powers from the UA would work really well for a Kitsune, who are usually Clerics or White mana Samurai in the old Sets.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Hobgoblins as such do not have a particularly big history. A real Wildcard from Kamigawa, though? The powers from the UA would work really well for a Kitsune, who are usually Clerics or White mana Samurai in the old Sets.
That’s actually my point. They could stand to give goblinoids a bigger and more heroic role in a setting than they’ve had before.

Of course, they could also be soemthing completely different, and the hobgoblin could be a ruse, but I rather hope not. Hobs are one of the playable folk I would like to have more lore for.
 

Absolutely. So that invites speculation. What settings for D&D or MtG make sense to highlight Hobgoblins by themselves, or for Goblinoids to play a central role generally?

Remembering, always, that they aren’t bound to canon, and many MtG settings could stand some expansion.

I’d say Hobs are a great fit for either Kamigawa or Dominaria, but also I could see some retconning of a classic setting to give hobs or goblinoids generally a more central and/or heroic role.

If it’s Kamigawa, they may be threading a very narrow needle with Hobgoblins, but we will see.
For D&D, hobgoblin really only got some substantial focus in Dragonlance, in which, since it didn't have orcs, they got more of a chance to shine as the big mammalian humanoid antagonists (draconians of course took some of that spotlight, but were, obviously, reptilian). But without other Dragonlance races like kender or irda (and hopefully playable draconians), this seems somewhat unlikely...
 

For D&D, hobgoblin really only got some substantial focus in Dragonlance, in which, since it didn't have orcs, they got more of a chance to shine as the big mammalian humanoid antagonists (draconians of course took some of that spotlight, but were, obviously, reptilian). But without other Dragonlance races like kender or irda (and hopefully playable draconians), this seems somewhat unlikely...
May be they don’t think they need to test kender, or have it dialed in already more than hobgoblins and so figure they can rest it further down the road, once DL is announced. But yeah I won’t hold my breath for DL.
 

That’s actually my point. They could stand to give goblinoids a bigger and more heroic role in a setting than they’ve had before.

Of course, they could also be soemthing completely different, and the hobgoblin could be a ruse, but I rather hope not. Hobs are one of the playable folk I would like to have more lore for.
Ah, yes, slight lack of clarity there, I was thinking in terms of Magic Settings Hobgoblins really haven't been a distinct thing, more just Goblins as a vague group (there were Hobgoblin and Bugbear cards in the recent AFR Set, but they were just "Goblins" by creature type).

Currently, I'm leaning towards this being an attempt to move Hobgoblins away from being a weird Samurai trope,probably in the Multiverse book.
 

Currently, I'm leaning towards this being an attempt to move Hobgoblins away from being a weird Samurai trope,probably in the Multiverse book.
They may be experimenting with a replacement hobgoblin. However, if the Feywild hobgoblin is in the Multiverse book, I'd be shocked if it was in there as anything other than a new variant. It would be odd to make the only hobgoblins in the book incompatible with the ones in the core rules.

That said, I'm still doubtful they'd put any truly new material in the Multiverse book, just because it would annoy the heck out of anyone who already had the other two books in the boxed set and felt Wizards was trying to pressure them into buying them again. (Yes, they could also wait many months for the standalone release, but that would also annoy people...)

Also, it wouldn't take a complete, radical redesign to strip out the "samurai" tropes from the 5E hobgoblin - just revert back to the 3E or 4E designs and rename their Volo's racial trait, and you'd be fine. One reason this Feywild hobgoblin feels like a variant, not a replacement; I'm betting on the their appearing in some unannounced product.

EDIT: Slight amendment after seeing this post in another thread. I still don't think we're replacing the default, core hobgoblin yet - for the reasons above - but I can see an argument for it happening in 2024 when the core rules get overhauled.
 
Last edited:

Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top