Alright! Who said that?!?!?!Infiniti2000 said:Only if they have improved natural attacks.![]()
Alright! Who said that?!?!?!Infiniti2000 said:Only if they have improved natural attacks.![]()
*raises hand*Legildur said:Alright! Who said that?!?!?!
Hammerhead said:Why? Are a bunch of TWFing, Flurrying Monks going to start an unstoppable unchecked killing spree?
That is not a reason. Otherwise, you might as well outlaw magic in its entirety.billd91 said:Why? It cuts short the question of whether or not TWF can be used with flurry, what weapons are involved, what the modifiers are, and so on. The effect of flurry and TWF are quite similar. The rules are quite simply easier if they are the same tactic, just with specific benefits for the monk.
And simpler, in this case, is better.
Simplicity is not a reason. Otherwise you'd outlaw half the magic effects in the game as they are too complex (Polymorph, Legend Lore, etc.). You might as well outlaw AC while you are at it, all those crazy categories of bonuses and what stacks and what don't. Confusing and overly complex, I tell you! And bonuses, any bonuses! Yeesh! Make up your minds already, WotC! Stop it with the "some stack, some don't" nonsense! And the different size and reach!billd91 said:Of course it's a reason. It's just one you don't like.
Ranger REG said:Would that also includes the upcoming Rules Compendium?![]()
Um, how?? Were they fighting commoners, or what?? Maybe kobolds with no class levels??mvincent said:Coincidentally, they have in my last three campaigns.![]()
rowport said:Um, how?? Were they fighting commoners, or what?? Maybe kobolds with no class levels??