So quick question. Where exactly in the phb does it talk about wielding a weapon in your off hand without the "off hand" keyword? I have been looking through the thing for about a half hour with no luck......DAMN YOU INDEX!!!
Page 104, middle of the right-hand column. It's an exclusive feature for rangers who choose the two-blade fighting style.
well i like to think that they would never say you cant duel wield scimitars and the like.....i mean how could they? i can do it in real life........why not in a game where im suppose to be better than real life? that would just be upsetting....
PJB said:Some one-handed weapons are light enough for![]()
you to use in your off hand while holding another
one-handed weapon in your other hand. Doing this
doesn’t let you make multiple attacks in a round
(unless you have powers that let you do so), but you
can attack with either weapon.
Theoretically, if we wish to completely go by RAW, it would let you use one handed weapons as if they had the Off-Hand designation. The only times this is actually mentioned in the rules is Ranger Powers which specify "Off hand" and the Two-Weapon Flurry feat. Without this class ability you could still use Two Weapon Fighting abilities which don't say anything about "off-hand" such as Two Weapon Fighting or Dire Wolverine Strike however.Here's your exception, that off-hand weapons are the weapons that can be held off-hand. If -any- weapon could be done so (barring Ranger shinanegans, of course), then what, prey tell, does the off-hand feature do for a weapon?