D&D 5E Using "D&D 2024" instead of "5e24"

Dire Bare

Legend
I do not remember this being true, and I believe it is not accurate. I never heard the term "3.5e" before WotC used it.

Googling this is a bit hard, but most of the fan-naming I can find of the "next edition" before 3.5e was announced seems to assume it would be 4e. I can't find the 3.5e name until WotC announced it. Any alternative data backing up your statement would be appreciated.
That's what I remember, but sorry . . . that was 20 years ago, and not worth doing "homework" over.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Hussar

Legend
Doesn't make it right, and it's gotten worse as WotC 5e has become more popular. It's a serious, "Now all restaurants are Taco Bell" situation.

Again, it has always been thus.

Look I constantly use 3pp. The campaigns I’ve run since 3e started have always featured lots of 3pp content. Scarred Lands, World’s Largest Dungeon, Primeval Thule. Hell the first WotC module I ever bought was DragonHeist.

I’m a long time 3pp fan. I get loving 3pp.

But outside of a tiny handful of us? 3pp might as well not exist. It just doesn’t even register. I constantly rail against this but it’s the truth. For the overwhelming majority of gamers, if 3pp vanished tomorrow they wouldn’t even notice.

And it has always been like this. I don’t understand this perception that 3pp are somehow more visible than they are. Think about it this way- a million dollar kickstarter is huge news right? And over the years there’s been quite a few of them.

How do you think that compares to the least popular WotC title in the last ten years? This isn’t me being some WotC fanboy. I’m asking a serious question. If you picked ten million dollar kickstarter titles - any ten at random - and the worst selling WotC title, which do you think would be more recognized at random tables?
 
Last edited:

Micah Sweet

Level Up & OSR Enthusiast
Again, it has always been thus.

Look I constantly use 3pp. The campaigns I’ve run since 3e started have always featured lots of 3pp content. Scarred Lands, World’s Largest Dungeon, Primeval Thule. Hell the first WotC module I ever bought was DragonHeist.

I’m a long time 3pp fan. I get loving 3pp.

But outside of a tiny handful of us? 3pp might as well not exist. It just doesn’t even register. I constantly rail against this but it’s the truth. For the overwhelming majority of gamers, if 3pp vanished tomorrow they wouldn’t even notice.

And it has always been like this. I don’t understand this perception that 3pp are somehow more visible than they are. Think about it this way- a million dollar kickstarter is huge news right? And over the years there’s been quite a few of them.

How do you think that compares to the least popular WotC title in the last ten years? This isn’t me being some WotC fanboy. I’m asking a serious question. If you picked ten million dollar kickstarter titles - any ten at random - and the worst selling WotC title, which do you think would be more recognized at random tables?
I'm not saying it isn't true. I'm saying it's very sad, and I wish it wasn't so.
 



Minigiant

Legend
Supporter
I'm going to call it D&D 5.1, because that is the standard versioning nomenclature for a new version that adds new features but doesn't break backwards compatibility. Version 3.5 of D&D coming directly after 3.0 was an abomination.

5.24e seems more appropriate as it is most "5e with TCOE and XGTE variants and a few tweaks and rebalancing."

The biggest change is that every PC gets a very weak feat at level 1.
We don't even know if the MM or DMG are getting any real changes outside of clarity and reorganization.

Is it closer to D&D 3.5e to PF1? Because people called that 3.75e so would this too be a "quarter edition"?
 





Remove ads

Top