Nice to be the NYT and completely ignore an embargo. Guess what would have happened if I'd posted it early?
This is my concern.Interesting that WotC are conducting this experiment but I can't help thinking of the equation:
Camel = Horse + Committee
Seems most likely to result in a design that appeals to the lowest common denominator. Quite the opposite of how the original game was conceived and developed.
Still, will follow with interest and participate, if possible and if, as the article suggests, it's more than an open beta.
So WoTC already got started off the wrong foot! An omen or just a blip?Nice to see WotC promoting the NYT article on Twitter despite the broken embargo.
Here we go again.So WoTC already got started off the wrong foot! An omen or just a blip?
Nice to see WotC promoting the NYT article on Twitter despite the broken embargo.
Here we go again.
What's the embargo story/history?
So who volunteers to trawl through thousands of pages to produce 'The Best of Enworld's 5E suggestions?'![]()
Great, then I nominate you to produce the Best of Enworld's 5E Suggestions. However, I warn you, I will withdraw my nomination if you dare to add potion helmets to the mixI do! Funny how everybody's suggestions seem to line up perfectly with what I want out of 5E.![]()
Nice to see WotC promoting the NYT article on Twitter despite the broken embargo.
OK, OK. I'll talk. It's close enough to the deadline.
It's a Hot Italian Beef miniatures set.
There. I've said it.
![]()