Will you be giving the PCs the +1 bonus to attacks and defences every 5 levels that the system expects? If not, at high levels the PCs will be significantly weaker than they're supposed to be relative to the monsters. The defender will probably suffer more than other roles as he really needs AC to do his job properly.
I can see defenders being affected, but most agree that defenders are the least necessary class type right?
IMO, both your statements are very wrong.
Emirikol said:Which , IYO (or your campaign), is the least necessary class type?
Except for Warlords which are dependent on a weapon to hit their attacks, since most their powers works only on a hit.Leaders would be the least affected. They have the most abilities that don't require them to attack enemies, so the missing attack bonuses don't matter as much.
Btw, leaders & defenders are the most necessary roles for a party to have, followed by strikers then controllers.
-blarg
Except for Warlords which are dependent on a weapon to hit their attacks, since most their powers works only on a hit.
This. Alle 4E classes are equally dependent on magic items.... which is to say that in 4e, no class is really significantly more item-dependent than another (except that some classes, or at least some builds, really need a weapon and an implement rather than just one).