Laurefindel
Legend
My (banjo-playing) friend would say that you cannot use « banjo » and « mastery » in the same sentence, except when specifying that « banjo » and « mastery » cannot be used in the same sentence.You can't use Banjos.
My (banjo-playing) friend would say that you cannot use « banjo » and « mastery » in the same sentence, except when specifying that « banjo » and « mastery » cannot be used in the same sentence.You can't use Banjos.
Oh, very cool. We did something similar calling it the "Prologue Level".5th Ed. is missing rules for 0th-level player characters, which is why I wrote this:
now on sale for 30% off!
Your post made me hungry. If that was the intent, congratulations!Nah, 5e isn’t a half-baked cookie, it’s a cookie intentionally baked with a soft centre, you know, crunchy on the outside and chewy on the inside!
But I agree with the essence of your post; D&D doesn’t really need much more width but it could use some depth. It is at least relatively shallow throughout the whole thing, so it works as a chewy cookie. But reworking the rules to a uniformly deep system is too much of an undertaking than the effort I’m willing to give (by running a more complete, complex game I mean).
As it is, 5e has the advantage of being digestible without too many glasses of milk, but I would appreciate deeper, more complete subsystems that I can use à la carte, focusing on the themes of my campaign. Like white chocolate chips and macadenian nuts for example.
You think that's great, look up the Invoked Devastation!I'm a youngin', so learning about the Rain of Colorless Fire made my day. What a sick piece of lore. Thanks!
Nice!Oh, very cool. We did something similar calling it the "Prologue Level".
I feel like it’s better than the current system where spells affect creatures based on their type.Alignment mechanics in previous editions seemed to boil down to:
1. If your alignment tag doesn't match with the alignment tag of x item, take damage (or suffer effect).
2. If your alignment tag doesn't match, you can't use this class/item/thing.
3. If you change your alignment tag you lose a level.
It's not like any edition had deep mechanics.
No doubt bards and gnomes are troublesome. But come on, they are nothing compared to kender!You folks are being really hard on the bards, especially considering the real problem is gnomes.