Why do you play games other than D&D?

[soviet]

But the PCs in BB aren't finding out who did anything. They're coming up with their best educated guess and then using a game mechanic including a randomizing element that determines if they are right. It's literally Schrodinger's Mystery.

Neither are the players in your game! They think they are, and they make dice rolls, but you never tell them if they were right or not.

 

[Micah Sweet]

You're telling me that you create mysteries that cannot be solved, and then when the players incorrectly think they have solved them, and go to the authorities about an actually innocent person, you say 'sure thing'?

Nah, I don't run mysteries as a specific thing. But if I did, and the PCs fingered an innocent, I wouldn't stop the game to correct them.

 

[Micah Sweet]

Neither are the players in your game! They think they are, and they make dice rolls, but you never tell them if they were right or not.

But there is an answer, so they're either right or they aren't. And in practice, I bet most people who come to a conclusion end up with the right answer.

See, you're looking at this from the perspective of the players, while I'm seeing it as what happens in the setting. Again, satisfying narrative is not my highest priority.

 

[Micah Sweet]

Neither are the players in your game! They think they are, and they make dice rolls, but you never tell them if they were right or not.

Besides, how could I give them a definitive answer without stepping outside the action in play?

 

[SableWyvern]

How does that work? You're playing a traditional sort of investigative game, the players analyse the clues and think they've found a solution, then what? They apprehend the person they believe to be the murderer and they say nothing? No further evidence is found? How do the players know they solved it?

It would probably depend entirely on the context of the specific situation, what means the PCs have access to to validate their conclusions and how they go about employing those means.

 

[soviet]

See, you're looking at this from the perspective of the players, while I'm seeing it as what happens in the setting.

I've been stating all along that I'm talking about the subjective experience of the players. I don't know what you mean by 'what happens in the setting' outside the experience of the participants.

Again, satisfying narrative is not my highest priority.

I don't know what this means or what it is in response to. I haven't mentioned the N word once.

 

[Bagpuss]

Why would you play only D&D when there is a wealth of different experiences to be had with other genres and systems?