D&D General Why Enworld should liberate D&D from Hasbro

[Corinnguard]

TSR ran it into the ground 30 years ago and yet here it is, still chuggin' along.

If WotC does manage to run D&D into the ground there's exactly zero doubt that someone will come along and revive it or, if necessary, reboot it from scratch. in fact, the biggest problem would probably be too many 'someones' all trying to rescue it at once and all pulling in different directions.

EN World must have used a little divination magic four years ago to foresee WoTC's attempt to run D&D into the ground. How else can we explain the debut of Level Up, an advanced version of 5e D&D?

 

[lotuseater]

This is quite literally the most bizarre thread I've ever seen on Enworld.

 

[Azzy]

This is quite literally the most bizarre thread I've ever seen on Enworld.

It's certainly an object lesson in absurdity.

 

[Zardnaar]

This is quite literally the most bizarre thread I've ever seen on Enworld.

New here?

 

[Umbran]

Agree

Its also

4) not contained in my post at all

Mod note:
The rules are: if you have an issue with moderation, you take it to PM with one of the mods.

Breaking the rules to argue that you weren't breaking the rules is not persuasive.

 

[Gradine]

This is quite literally the most bizarre thread I've ever seen on Enworld.

 

[Zardnaar]

I am Alpharius though.

 

[Deset Gled]

This is quite literally the most bizarre thread I've ever seen on Enworld.

Please.

M

Thread 'Scuze Update'

Mar 16, 2007

i will be making, or be trying to make weekly updats, theese will help some , harder to perswaid people make up there minds. So anay way, today J Grigs spat in rhe teacher's face. what did he say as his defence? "i was laughing" he honistly sead that.

if you havnt seen "scues atack!" here is a link.

http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=191021
scues atack!

• Mann Gegen Mann
• Replies: 30
• Forum: *Geek Talk & Media

 

[LuisCarlos17f]

Woody Allen said:
"I don't know the key to success, but I know that the key to failure is trying to please everybody"

We can agree a company can't please everybody, but it has to choose what sector of market they are willing to sacrifice. I don't want to give examples but there are some cases in the last years about how to try to attract certain kind of customers they have caused stampede or they shoo away a bigger group of customers.

A company has to understand the profile of each sector of its customers to give what the majority wants.

And if it is a product for underage then there is a hard and hidden censorship, the parents who buy those products for their children. And we can guess the profile of majority of parents. Their money their rules.

There is a right and a wrong way to be inclusive. The right way is "everybody is wellcome to the table" and the wrong way is to ignore the old customers who aren't in the current VIP list.

And I don't like the two tiers, when the signs of simpathy or support are showed only in a place but not in others because there the rules are different. That is not coherence and lots of customers notice it.

 

[Gradine]

Please.

I mean, have we forgotten, collectively, the umpteen threads with titles like "If The Barons Daughter Marries The Son Of The Burgomaster, Will The Margraves Brother Rise In Rebellion?"