Many unique playstyles will soon be unplayable due to corporate greed....
...and punish the munchkins.
For those that prefer to call the 2024 books "5.5" - what is wrong with, say, 5e24 (is it really iust tjat one more keystroke!?).
Oh, I'm sure I've used 5.5 myself at various times. I'm not a fan of it, but in spite of appearances here, I'm not going to argue with everyone who wants to use it.I've used '5.5E' and '5E2024'.
Because people like consistency. They don't want to necessarily learn a bunch of rules that are only applicable at certain tables. Especially if they play at multiple tables. "Oh, wait, I've been rolling critical damage all wrong. It's Bob's table that maxes one die, not Steve's table."So, that doesn't make a whole lot of sense, in the context I was responding to.
I was responding to how supposedly, a significant number of people have to (substantially?) houserule D&D to make it do what they want.
My response to that is that, we D&D gamers have done that, traditionally, anyway. It is not new. If what they want is for the game to play more like older, traditional rules, it is even more ironic - it is arguing that folks should not take traditional steps to get traditional playstyle.
It is unclear to me how players not being able to switch tables keeps people from using house rules.
At the risk of starting this up again, when it was so beautifully concluded (honestly, sorry everyone). I feel like asking:
For those that prefer to call the 2024 books "5.5" - what is wrong with, say, 5e24 (is it really iust tjat one more keystroke!?).
Are you sure that you're not just stuck on a 20 year old marketing gimmick from 3.5? Or does it "make sense" to you only because you lived with it then, in some sort of formative years?
I mean, I guess I get how it works for an online community like this one, but I don't understand why some folks feel that it is an objectively better name than what WotC came up with.
I feel ya.I hate my phone.
I don't actually find that.5.5 is quick and easy. Look at your typos in your post lol.
You can skip the 5e, or the 20, and call it 2024 or 5e24. I don't know how those are harder than 5.5, really.5E2024 is a pain to type.
Inertia I understand (it's what I've been pointing out as the likely "real" answer as to why the term is advocated for.)Inertia, consistency and convenience.
3 vs 4 and 2 of them are the sameI feel ya.
I don't actually find that.
You can skip the 5e, or the 20, and call it 2024 or 5e24. I don't know how those are harder than 5.5, really.
Inertia I understand (it's what I've been pointing out as the likely "real" answer as to why the term is advocated for.)
Consistency, I don't get, because only one "edition" was ever called that, and it was over 20 years ago!
Convenience, I guess I understand, but I don't particularly agree with. At least 2024 (by itself) is all numbers. Two of them are the same! And it's not "stubbornly calling it what (I) feel like calling it" - it's what it's been named, for better or worse.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.