Epametheus
First Post
A wizard that actually manages to lose to a sorcerer is a disgrace to wizardry in general.apsuman said:And despite all those added features they gave the wizard, the sorcerer still manages to kick his #$%^&!.
![]()
A wizard that actually manages to lose to a sorcerer is a disgrace to wizardry in general.apsuman said:And despite all those added features they gave the wizard, the sorcerer still manages to kick his #$%^&!.
![]()
Talmun said:I'd have to say, as a player I prefer the monk to just about any class, ..., he can even tank for a short time.
Epametheus said:A wizard that actually manages to lose to a sorcerer is a disgrace to wizardry in general.
Epametheus said:A wizard that actually manages to lose to a sorcerer is a disgrace to wizardry in general.
Calico_Jack73 said:I myself prefer a monkey to a parrot. It can do all sorts of things parrots can't and when it gets naughty I can spank it.![]()
Honestly, in Skull & Bones you can take the monkey or parrot as a feat (I can't remember the exact name) and it is great for getting you out of trouble.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.