shilsen
Adventurer
I was looking at Complete Warrior and the Spellsword PrC, and noticed that there doesn't seem to be any real reason why a fighter-mage would not take it. The prerequisites are such as any fighter-mage would have, and the benefits far outweigh what is given up. In contrast, the other ftr/wiz PrC in the book (Bladesinger, which I think is a nicely designed one) has a whole slew of prerequisites which are not so commonly taken.
A Ftr3/Wiz3 (the fastest one can pick it up, except for a Ftr1/Brd4) over the next 10 levels of Spellsword gets better saves, hit points, and BAB than if one split the levels between fighter and wizard. What is given up is 2-3 fighter bonus feats, 1 wizard bonus feat, the familiar progression and access to feats which require a certain number of fighter levels. In addition, one gets a bonus feat, the ability to lower spell failure chance by 30%, and the ability to channel a spell through one's weapon 5 times per day.
Is there any reason other than roleplaying why a fighter-mage would not take the Spellsword?
A Ftr3/Wiz3 (the fastest one can pick it up, except for a Ftr1/Brd4) over the next 10 levels of Spellsword gets better saves, hit points, and BAB than if one split the levels between fighter and wizard. What is given up is 2-3 fighter bonus feats, 1 wizard bonus feat, the familiar progression and access to feats which require a certain number of fighter levels. In addition, one gets a bonus feat, the ability to lower spell failure chance by 30%, and the ability to channel a spell through one's weapon 5 times per day.
Is there any reason other than roleplaying why a fighter-mage would not take the Spellsword?