worlds and monsters is in my hands

Hmm ... I wonder what the most powerful metallic dragon is now, gold or adamantine. Actually, I wonder if they are even going that route any more - maybe the dragon colors are all roughly equal in power.

It's weird for me to think that there could be a good red dragon ... ;)
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Jonathan Moyer said:
Hmm ... I wonder what the most powerful metallic dragon is now, gold or adamantine. Actually, I wonder if they are even going that route any more - maybe the dragon colors are all roughly equal in power.

It's weird for me to think that there could be a good red dragon ... ;)

I kinda like it. But then I was on the verge of houseruling dragons anyway. I like people having to rely on local reports to know what a dragon's breath weapon and personality is, rather than having it all predetermined based on color.
 

I imagine Dragons will be generally unaligned like most "ordinary" PC races. Since if Dragons are entirely sentient-beings they should be able to develop their own personality. Though like ordinary PC races I imagine each type of Dragon would have certain "dominant personality traits" so a Red Dragon could have less-wholesome personality traits when compared to say a Gold, but not necessarily evil.
 

Love, just LOVE everything from wartorn's post. Especially the bits about the undead--that "animus" concept is how I've houseruled undead for quite some time now.

I like the dragons, too, especially the removal of brass & bronze and the addition of iron dragon. But adamantine dragon? No thanks. I'd much rather they did the excellent suggestion of a Mercury dragon. The Adamantine dragon does indeed seem like simply a dragon that's more "iron" than an Iron Dragon. So now we're back to the whole brass & bronze similarity...
 

Iffy. I was a HUGE fan of the 3e dragon set-up, and I think we might loose some of the cool dragon schticks: brass dragons being loquacious and wind-based, clever trickster copper dragons being able to build entire canyons, bronze dragon's fascination with humanity and their coastal habitat and fog-based powers....

They could have used some simplification, but really.....

Cookie-cutter monsters bore me. If you don't hit the three points of Ally, Adversary, and Anybody, you're not so much a piece of the world as you are a piece of game mechanics with a name attached. YAWN.
 


I'm surprised they didn't include...

Steel Dragon.

Steel_Dragon_Band.jpg


Now that would be METAL.
 

What? No brass or bronze dragons?

Well, looks like I'll have to make those up for myself if I'm going to write up some Dragonlance 4e conversion notes. Sheesh.

Cheers,
Cam
 

I was never a big fan of chromatic and metallic dragons, but I guess that they are going to stick around in D&D for a while longer. Oh well, as long as they aren't all absurd spellcasters anymore, it is an improvement.

On the specifics, though, I approve of Iron Dragons. It is so obvious that I am surprised it did not occur from the beginning. The image of a dull black dragon whose scales are slowly fading to a blood red rust color at the edges... I hope they are as cool-looking as that. I am willing to bet that if any of the metallics other than Golds are fire-breathers, it will be the Iron Dragons.

I agree with the idea that Adamantine Dragons don't sound like a good idea. Mercurial Dragons sound like a much better concept, if you ask me. Mercury is an underused metal in D&D. We got every kind of Golem imaginable, including absurd things that should have been oozes or undead instead, but never a Mercury Golem?

I also like the sound of the Shadow Power Source, so long as its flavor is designed better than it was in the Tome of Magic. I never really liked that section of that book, and a lot of that has to do with the overly intrusive to campaigns flavor they gave Shadow magic. I would prefer it more if it resembles the shadow powers from the videogame Odin Sphere (a great game for D&D to steal ideas from if I have ever seen one).
 


Remove ads

Top