pezagent
First Post
Enforcer said:Let's see...I also hated Blade Runner. I got the director's cut on DVD because everyone said it was a "must own" for the new format. That movie was soooo stupid. Maybe I'm just pissed that I spent money on it, who knows?
Oh no! Blade Runner is the quintessential sci-fi movie!
The special effects--All shot with models and matte paintings, composited with optical printers! No computers used at all. If you ever get a chance to see pictures of the model of Los Angeles, it's quite intense.
The editing is incredible. All done before non-linear editing was available. What a chore!
The Vangelis (that's a hard G, by the way) soundtrack is beautiful--composed with analog synths at the time. He didn't release it until the DVD came out. Before that, fans were faced to listen to the "New Light Orchestra."
The quotes pulled from that movie are great... Did you get your precious... photos? I want more life,




Rutger Hauer gives the performance of his lifetime as Roy Batty... Daryl Hannah will always be Pris, and Harrison Ford in his first and only role with a crew cut.
Yes, the script has flaws, but that's what gives it charm. There's a lot more soul in Blade Runner than there ever will be in movies to come. Computers make everything so simple these days--take the new Star Wars films, which I consider to be amongst the worst ever made--nothing but CGI! I could have killed Lucas for ruining the original Star Wars movies with his digital "remakes". Ruins the whole thing.
Blade Runner represents a moment in sci-fi history that was captured by a very talented and imaginative crew. You'll never see that caliber of work done on a movie ever again. Not even in LOTR.
I believe one must watch BR for what it achieved at the time it was made, not in the context of the films being made today. It's age is certainly starting to show, but one must also remember how much Blade Runner influenced almost every sci-fi movie ever made after it's release.
/johnny
