Mathew_Freeman
Adventurer
Plus, never underestimate the role of narrative causality. Sometimes things happen in stories because it's good for the story. 

It didn't matter if the architect showed Neo that Trinity was in danger or not.
Trinity, as a member of Zion is doomed if he went through the other door and went with the destruction of Zion and reboot.
I actually agree with most of your points but allow me to offer a potential clarification. The Architect doesn't understand humanity, drive or emotion at all. It may come close to understand behavior and survival instincts but one of the classic man vs. machine conflicts is machine's inability to overcome the human spirit. I still contend that the Matrix films are still about that basic (and time honored) stuggle, just with a few twists in there. Honestly, I don't think they have done the best job at it, but the conflict is still there...Quasqueton said:That's why I'm not understanding the ending. If the Architect wanted Neo to choose reloading, why give The One such a compelling reason to choose otherwise? If the Architect didn't want Neo to choose reloading, everything he said in the movie is a lie.
Quasqueton said:But by rebooting, Neo could choose 23 humans to live and restart Zion. Trinity could have been among those chosen.
Quasqueton said:In two watchings of the movie, it really looks to me that everything was set up for Neo to choose Trinity over humanity. But every *said* sounded like the opposite.
That's why I'm not understanding the ending. If the Architect wanted Neo to choose reloading, why give The One such a compelling reason to choose otherwise? If the Architect didn't want Neo to choose reloading, everything he said in the movie is a lie.
Quasqueton