What a terrible analogy.Not entirely sure that logic applies.
Person says that they have a lot of cars. They don't want to bother pricing them out, so they will sell any car for $5000 on the lot.
It is pointed out, prior to the offer being made public, that the lot happens to contain three Bugattis and two McLarens, in addition to the fleet of old Camrys. The person removes the five cars, and sells off the rest.
First, those old Camrys are still going to be ranked best to worst. And most buyers are going to want the best remaining car.
Second, you are claiming that the feats being banned are somehow so far exceptional/superior (or broken) that they exceed the value of the others by a factor equivalent to a McLaren/Bugatti to an old Camry. That's ridiculous hyperbole. Feats have an intrinsic level of subjective value that simply do not compare to car prices. And even if given some feats can be seen as generally better than certain others to some degree, nothing like the disparity in worth by such a magnitude you are implying.