My questions are substantial. I'm requesting you follow your chain of logic and notice the gap between how you're arguing and what you're trying to prove.
I already answered your extremely hypothetical, loaded questions as best I could without your actually committing to any sort is substantive position. If you wanted to advance your position, you woul have to take the infinitesimal risk of actually articulating it.
As to the point I made about the Essence of D&D likely being the Primacy of Magic, I've supported extensively with reference to the actual content if the various incarnations of the game itself.
I do rest the supposition, in part on the acknowledgement of 4e as being Not-D&D, and of clones like PF1 as being D&D.
You seem to conflate this supposition with some other position you find intollerable.
I had previously invited you to offer some contribution of substance to the discussion. I realize, now, that you have no such contributions to make, and that your defensiveness was provoked by my unfairly pressuring you to do so. That was wrong of me.
You have my apologies.
I'll try not to unduly antagonize you like that again going forward.