It's just the way pandemics work. Anyone vulnerable that gets it dies early
It is a vast oversimplification. It isn't like the virus gets into a nation, and hits everywhere equally instantaneously, and all the vulnerable people die. There's some pretty complicated dynamics between the spread of disease through populations over time, and the death rate as it penetrates new areas, which gets more complicated by social distancing efforts and medical care of varying quality. End result is that you are very likely to see multiple peaks and valleys in the death rate that have little to do with particular vulnerability.
That is why Canada has such a high death rate compared to the number of confirmed cases.
I posted this link about a month ago, but I think it bears repeating:
![]()
U.S. Coronavirus Death Toll Is Far Higher Than Reported, C.D.C. Data Suggests (Published 2020)
In seven hard-hit states, total deaths are nearly 50 percent higher than normal, according to new C.D.C. statistics, suggesting that the virus has killed far more people than the number in official counts.www.nytimes.com
Unfortunately, I can't find any story with updated data, probably because the data doesn't exist yet. It can take months to get this compiled. Next year this time, we'll be able to compare expected death rate to actually death rate vs. COVID numbers. Until then, we're just guessing. And I have to say, the fact that we're still "guessing" about the numbers to this degree disgusts me.
And I have to say, the fact that we're still "guessing" about the numbers to this degree disgusts me.
So, haivng computers on all of our desks tends to make us think that getting data from point A to point B should be trivial. It isn't. Gathering data from thousands of disparate physical world sources, from people who are, in fact, generally busy with keeping people alive, is not a lickety-split instant task.
We live in a real world, with practical limitations.