Chaosmancer
Legend
What a lack of imagination.
Ok take the two paladins. Oath of protection. All first options.
The LG is pretty obvious. But the LE?
Here we have a paladin that will defend his country/king. But he will do it with extreme prejudice against the enemies of the country. Since he wants to protect his people, he will be caring about everyone underneath him. He will even show kindness to all he protects.
The difference will be in how he faces the enemies of his country/king. Where our first paladin will show mercy, the second one will not. He will try to bring enemies to justice but he will not forgive nor hesitate to kill on the spot someone that has been working against the kingdom. While both will brag about their exploit, the first one will brag about how he brought criminals to justice while the second will brag how he administered justice to the "wicked".
The first one will work for his lord and will stand by him no matter what. The second one will do the same, but if he ever get the feeling that he could become the king without too much risks...
You get the picture.
Right, they don't share the same ideal, bond or Flaw.
For the first, mercy is a major consideration, an ideal perhaps, while for the second it is the destruction of threats.
One is concerned with Justice, the other with Inquisitions and Purity
One is undying loyal to the king... the other doesn't share that bond, he will seek to be king, because then he could act more forcefully to defend the nation and make it "Pure"
In clarifying, you proved your premise false