D&D 5E Blogatog: "[AFR is] looking to be one of the best-selling sets in the history of the game."


log in or register to remove this ad




MoonSong

Rules-lawyering drama queen but not a munchkin
I think the term “premier set” is what’s causing the confusion. People are hearing “no more D&D premier sets” and, being fairly casual Magic players, don’t really know what the “premier” part means, so it looks like “no more D&D sets” to them.
If it isn't a standard release, then it means "no more D&D sets for you". Nonstandard sets are the definition of premiere. High production values, Limited allocation, limited distribution, and in turn heavy premiums on what already starts at twice or thrice the base price. If it isn't a standard release, I won't be able to find it, and if I find it, I won't be able to afford it. In the remote case I can afford it, what I get to afford will be a meanigless fraction of the set. In many ways it is worse than no more D&D sets period, because that way what I already have at least is complete. With all future D&D sets being premium releases what I already have will sit increasingly incomplete.
 

Charlaquin

Goblin Queen (She/Her/Hers)
If it isn't a standard release, then it means "no more D&D sets for you". Nonstandard sets are the definition of premiere. High production values, Limited allocation, limited distribution, and in turn heavy premiums on what already starts at twice or thrice the base price. If it isn't a standard release, I won't be able to find it, and if I find it, I won't be able to afford it. In the remote case I can afford it, what I get to afford will be a meanigless fraction of the set. In many ways it is worse than no more D&D sets period, because that way what I already have at least is complete. With all future D&D sets being premium releases what I already have will sit increasingly incomplete.
I understand that’s the case for you, I’m saying I think the terminology is what’s causing some people to think this decision was made because WotC considered AFR a failure, when in fact it’s probably in part due to its massive success.
 

Scribe

Legend
I think the term “premier set” is what’s causing the confusion. People are hearing “no more D&D premier sets” and, being fairly casual Magic players, don’t really know what the “premier” part means, so it looks like “no more D&D sets” to them.
Yeah, not sure why they have to make things confusing. Just call it Standard or Supplemental. Simple.
 


Scribe

Legend
They used to call them standard legal sets. They changed the term to premier because most players don’t actually play standard any more.
Most players would then be kitchen table and commander/edh?

I wouldn't surprised, but I've griped about how poorly they handled competitive formats already.
 


Remove ads

Top