D&D 5E List of All 33 Races in Mordenkainen's Monsters of the Multiverse

Mordenkainen Presents Monsters of the Multiverse contains 33 races compiled from previous Dungeons & Dragons books.

• Aarackocra
• Assimar
• Bugbear
• Centaur
• Changeling
• Deep Gnome
• Duergar
• Eladrin
• Fairy
• Firbolg
• Genasi, Air
• Genasi, Earth
• Genasi, Fire
• Gennasi, Water
• Githyanki
• Githzerai
• Goblin
• Goliath
• Harengon
• Hobgoblin
• Kenku
• Kobold
• Lizardfolk
• Minotaur
• Orc
• Satyr
• Sea Elf
• Shadar Kai
• Shifter
• Tabaxi
• Turtle
• Triton
• Yuan-ti

D&D 5E - Full List of Monsters in Mordenkainen Presents Monsters of the Multiverse

Mordenkainen Presents Monsters of the Multiverse contains revamped stat blocks for 260 monsters previously published in previous Dungeons & Dragons 5E books. The list was compiled by YouTuber Bob Worldbuilder based on some blurry screenshots originally shared by Nerd Immersion (see the video...

www.enworld.org

While reprinted, these races have all been updated to the current standard used by WotC for D&D races used in Tasha's Cauldron of Everything, including a free choice of ability score increases (increase one by 2 points and another by 1 point; or increase three by 1 point), and small races not suffering a movement speed penalty.

The video below from Nerd Immersion delves into the races in more detail.

 

[HammerMan]

How about we spit the difference, and just add 4e-style fighters, warlords, and simpler monster design and encounter math.

those in my minds would be great steps forward

 

[MGibster]

It's almost as if different people find different things fun and we don't need to disparage what another enjoys even if we ourselves might not find it fun.

I don't recall disparaging anyone for having a different opinion than mine. But perhaps I'm suffering from early onset Alzheimer's?

 

[Vaalingrade]

It's almost as if different people find different things fun and we don't need to disparage what another enjoys even if we ourselves might not find it fun.

Which would be fine if it weren't the bludgeon used to keep me from having nice things.

 

[Parmandur]

except you are compairing a rewriten race with optional swaps... I love Tasha's I dislike this half step...

btw add Duergar don't get the Dwarven racial traits,

But they do get other new powers: Deep Gnomes, for example include the SCAG Feat into the base Race. The rewritten Raves and the original Raves can play together at the table, it's not incompatible.

 

[Reynard]

Which would be fine if it weren't the bludgeon used to keep me from having nice things.

And who is wielding this bludgeon that it has an actual effect on your game at your table?

 

[Reynard]

I don't recall disparaging anyone for having a different opinion than mine. But perhaps I'm suffering from early onset Alzheimer's?

You didn't. You were just there for context.

 

[Vaalingrade]

And who is wielding this bludgeon that it has an actual effect on your game at your table?

The wizard players in the 5e playtest.

 

[Parmandur]

Consistency is important to me, and I doubt I’m the only one. I want a consistent rule set. Is that really such a horrible thing to want?

The rules are consistent, but options like Race or Class are exceptions to the rules. 2 PCs of the same fluff Race don't need to use the same rules exceptions, as long as they are balanced.

 

[HammerMan]

It's almost as if different people find different things fun and we don't need to disparage what another enjoys even if we ourselves might not find it fun.

Which would be fine if it weren't the bludgeon used to keep me from having nice things.

yeah, some people think basic fighters are fun (they get there fun)
Some want more advanced fighters (like 4e of 3.5 bo9s) would be fun...

notice how different people find different things fun is almost always an excuse for why group a doesn't want group b to have fun...

 

[HammerMan]

But they do get other new powers: Deep Gnomes, for example include the SCAG Geat into the base Race. The rewritten Raves and the original Raves can play together at the table, it's not incompatible.

go bak to the early 2000's and that is what they said about 3.0 and 3.5... notice what happened.