D&D Celebrity Satine Phoenix & Husband Jamison Stone Accused Of Abuse Towards Freelancers

Status
Not open for further replies.
D&D influencer Satine Phoenix, and her husband Jamison Stone, who run tabletop gaming company Apotheosis Studios, have been accused of abusive behavior towards freelancers and contracted workers.

Satine Phoenix is a well-known D&D personality and creator, and was the D&D Community Manager for about a year back in 2018. Both she and Stone have appeared in many events and streaming shows, and have worked with WotC, Geek & Sundry, and other companies. Recently their Kickstarter campaign Sirens: Battle of the Bards raised over $300,000. At GaryCon, a US gaming convention, the couple held a public wedding.

sirens.jpg

Accusations were initially leveled last week against Stone by tattooist Chad Rowe, who tweeted about the abusive way in which Stone, as his client at the time, treated him. The artist was "insulted, berated, and talked down to as if I was a lesser person". Other reports started to roll in as people shared similar experiences, with people revealing how they had been bullied by them, and how the pair frequently portrayed themselves as 'better' than those they worked with. At the time of writing there have been many such reports including one from voice actress and designer Liisa Lee who was subjected to underhanded business practices by Phoenix and her then partner Ruty Rutenberg. Others indicated difficulties in getting paid for work done for Stone and Phoenix or their company.

Lysa Penrose reported on problematic interactions while Phoenix worked at WotC, who was the primary point of contact regarding a report of abuse. Penrose reports that Phoenix failed to pass on the reports of abuse, and continued to publicly associate with the abuser.

Jamison Stone has since resigned as CEO of Apotheosis Studios (though the pair do own the company) and issued a long apology which has been widely criticized. Phoenix released a statement about a week later. Screenshots leaked from a private channel indicate that they have adopted a strategy of shifting the blame onto Stone, so that Phoenix's public image remain intact, with Stone writing “I also am ensuring behind the scenes ... we shield Satine as much as physically possible from damage.”

D&D In A Castle, which is an event which hosts D&D games run by professional DMs in a weekend break in a castle, has dropped the pair from its lineup, as has Jasper's Game Day, an organization which works to prevent suicides. Origins Game Fair, at which the couple are celebrity guests, removed Stone from its guest list, but not Phoenix, stating that "staff assessed that there was no immediate risk of physical harm".

According to ComicBook.com. former collaborator of Phoenix, Ruty Rutenberg, is suing Phoenix, alleging misappropriation of $40,000 of stream network Maze Arcana's money.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


log in or register to remove this ad

It's entirely possible that she's a bad actor (no doubt in my mind) and a victim of her husbands. I think it's also possible to recognize that and have some sympathy while holding her accountable for her actions and not wanting to have anything to do with her ever again.
 


That's like asking Arnold Schwarzenegger to use different names for Kindergarten Cop and Predator. You can do that. But it's not a must. And certainly not a moral failing.

I agree completely. It's just a business decision. Nothing more, nothing less.

You may be interested to know, though, that Arnold did use a different name earlier in his career (Arnold Strong), and that others in the industry recommended that he change his name. It wasn't a moral question in those cases, either, nor was he insulted by the suggestion. It was a branding decision, just as much as Arnold choosing to do Kindergarten Cop and Jingle All The Way was a branding decision for his career path.

In any case, Satine Phoenix is certainly going to face some extremely difficult branding decisions in the very near future.
 



How does one oppose the evil that is pornography without coming across as sex shaming? I would genuinely like to know.

I don’t really care what Satine does with her body. I do care that WotC openly and knowingly associates with people using their adult film star personas to promote a game marketed for children.

Yes, 12 year olds can find pornography online without WotC’s help, but that too is part of the problem. The effects of pornography on children and teens is nothing but negative.

I view this as being the same as if WotC was using known tobacco, alcohol or gambling industry people to promote their game.

Write me off as a backward prude if you must. That is my stance.

Whoa, there. I was agreeing with you from a branding and business perspective. I definitely don't think that pornography is evil. There are reasons I don't let my kids watch it, but there's a lot of space between healthy sex education and moral absolutes.
 



I have been puzzled about why WOTC would want association with adult film stars…do what you want personally but if you are wanting to attract a large crowd including kids, it’s a ponderous choice.

I enjoy music and sports. And a lot of times don’t exactly share values with those that provide me entertainment.

But in this industry I find that folks are held to really high standards. Like out of proportion high—-such that a lot of people shaking their heads and gasping about Phoenix think nothing of rocking to the music of deadbeats or buying products from big corporations that don’t care about much.

I am guilty of this too. I just find it an interesting phenomenon. If you are in the gaming industry and an asshat, your fans can turn really fast.

Often well deserved but unevenly applied…weird times…
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Remove ads

Top