D&D Movie/TV An Analysis of the Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves Trailer

The official trailer for Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves is out and I decided to dust off my film school education to give it a proper analysis not just as a TTRPG journalist but from a film criticism standpoint. Though I should note I did drop out of film school…

Logo.png

To start with, let’s talk about what a trailer is. It’s a commercial for the movie. This usually means its representative of what to expect from the film itself, but not always. As many YouTube experiments have shown, you can twist a film into pretty much anything using only two minutes of carefully selected clips like the classic Stanley Kubrick feel-good family comedy Shining. This means you can typically get an idea of what a film will be from the trailer, but you should never trust the trailer either. Scenes are often re-arranged and whole conversations created by splicing together different lines of dialogue with the intent of manufacturing drama or creating a joke. Scenes are sometimes shot solely for the trailer or end up on the cutting room floor before the film sees release. Special effects shots in particular will often change drastically from the trailer to the finished film, particularly for an effects-heavy genre film like Honor Among Thieves so far from the release date next year.

So with that in mind, let’s start talking about my thoughts on the trailer.


Initial impression is that early interviews with the creators indicated they were going for a Guardians of the Galaxy tone, and they definitely nailed that. An ensemble cast takes on a “we’re-trying-not-to-spoil-plot-details” threat of apocalyptic proportions while snarking at one another over scenes of either action or physical comedy but more frequently both at once. The film seems to be taking the plot, story, and source material seriously while allowing the comedy to come organically from the characters and situations in a way that feels grounded rather than forcing gags, winking at the audience, or going for an intentional comedic cheesiness. The performances are naturalistic rather than the over-the-top hamminess of the 2000 Dungeons & Dragons film. There are a few concerning bits here and there, but overall it looks like the sort of light adventure blockbuster typical of modern tentpole releases.

Now, I only watched the trailer once before writing that previous paragraph because I did notice a few things that bothered me and that excited me I wanted to go into more detail about, but doing so required covering the trailer with a fine-toothed comb. I wanted my initial reaction to play on its own the way most people would experience the trailer – watching it once then waiting for the next one – before I start nitpicking it to death after going frame-by-frame a hundred a forty-two times.

MacGuffin.png

A quick rundown of the plot based on the trailer: The bard Edgin and his partner-in-crime Holga stole a magical MacGuffin for someone. That someone turned out to be bad and now may unleash the greatest evil the world has ever seen (considering this is set in Faerûn which has seen multiple Gods go on rampages in events labeled “Sundering” or “Cataclysm”, this is either an exaggeration or some incredibly serious **** is about to go down). Edgin and Holga assemble a team to fix the apocalypse they accidentally assisted in starting with the help of the sorcerer Simon, the druid Doric, and the paladin Xenk. Hijinks ensue involving multiple dragons, the Red Wizards of Thay, and the Lord of Neverwinter Forge Fitzwilliam (though earlier material had his name as Forge Fletcher).

My first and biggest complaint (and the only one I mentioned on social media) is the lighting. I know it’s become standard to use flat, standardized lighting in films for ease of post-production effects work, conversions to 3D, and just because it’s easier to shoot without complex lighting setups. But it makes the film look flat almost like a TV show rather than a film that should have the budget and time to have proper lighting setups for each shot. Like I said before, this is a trailer and the film is over half a year from release so that may be fixed in post-production with a final pass at color grading.

Probably the most common criticism I’ve seen outside the TTRPG community online is the use of a slight remix of Led Zepplin’s “Whole Lotta Love”. The song doesn’t quite fit with the idea of a fantasy action-adventure…but Chris Pine’s character is a bard so the song’s theme fits the stereotype… Personally I’m not as concerned about this. It’s common to edit a trailer to a song for timing reasons and studios have opted to use the popular music rather than treat it as a temp track. It’s highly unlikely that the film’s score or soundtrack will include the song except maybe for the opening or closing credits.

Neverwinter.png

The trailer is packed with references to Dungeons & Dragons. Within hours of release, the first “D&D Movie Trailer Easter Eggs” videos showed up on YouTube with screenshots of the film with a little arrow pointed at nothing to clickbait you into going “Wait, why is that particular torch hanging on the wall significant?”. I’ve purposely avoided all of the reference lists online except for the one from the official Dungeons & Dragons YouTube account with Chris Perkins and Todd Kenreck. While someone more familiar with Forgotten Realms lore might catch a few more references than I did, here’s a quick rundown of everything I noticed: Neverwinter, a black dragon with acid breath, a few Red Wizards of Thay, a location that’s either Undermountain or the Underdark, a tiefling wildshaping into an owlbear, an animated statue of a dragon, several different spells but in particular a very interesting shot of dimension door, a location that is definitely Underdark and possibly Menzoberranzan or Gracklstugh, a mimic, a deplacer beast, a gelatinous cube, and a very chonky red dragon breathing fire. There are others that were more unclear either due to fast cuts, possible design changes for the film, or unfinished effects, such as a group of humanoids with greyish-white skin that seem too tall (or too short if Enlarged) to be duergar and too round-eared to be drow. If you want a blow-by-blow of every single tidbit, I’m sure they’ll start popping up online from your favorite sources soon.

Enchantment.png

As is obvious from the number of references just in the trailer, this film does not shy away from the more fantastical elements of Forgotten Realms. Rather than try to hide the magic to create a more quote-unquote grounded setting, magic permeates almost every single shot in the trailer. Swords crackle with magical energy, enchanted items beyond weapons and armor hide in corners of the scree, and so many spells are thrown around I couldn’t even begin to count them all.

Speaking of armor, the costuming in the film is spot on. The armor designs look unique yet functional in a way that sets it apart from typical “ripped from history” designs we frequently see in fantasy films while still seeming like something that would protect the people wearing it. The non-armor outfits look setting-appropriate without feeling dated or out of place. Chris Pine’s leather jacket wouldn’t turn your head if you saw someone wearing it on the street, but it still blends seamlessly with other characters’ cloaks and robes. Whatever the costume designer was paid for this film, it was not enough.

DoricFlip-opt.gif

It's difficult to judge the cinematography from a trailer because modern trailers are edited at a frenetic pace that prevents the audience from seeing a lot of more subtle camera work. However, there are many shots that I thought looked amazing. Particularly the dimension door I mentioned earlier that has Sophia Lillis’s druid Doric doing a flip from one location into another is stunning and an overhead panning shot of a Red Wizard of They holding the film’s magical MacGuffin over his head that’s just the right amounts of clearly communicating information while still giving the feeling of disorientation and unease.

I’ve tried to avoid comparing this film too much to the 2000 live-action film, but one part the trailer shows off well that I think deserves mention is the fight choreography. In that there’s actual fight choreography. The most obvious is Michelle Rodriguez looking more badass than she ever has in a film (a high standard to meet with her film resume) showing the raw strength and agility of a barbarian by oh my god she picks up a guy in full plate armor three feet in the air before slamming him into the ground. The action also seems varied with Regé-Jean Page’s Xenk facing off against multiple foes at once, the group dodging several dangerous monsters in an arena, and a large battle scene between opposing armies that seems to get interrupted by a surprise dragon.

TheBand.png

While the ensemble of protagonists will be a five man band, the focus in the trailer seems to be on three of the characters in particular: the human bard Edgin Darvis (Chris Pine), the barbarian Holga Kilgor (Michelle Rodriguez), and the tiefling druid Doric (Sophia Lillis). While the paladin Xenk (Regé-Jean Page) and half-elf sorcerer Simon (Justice Smith) have some screentime, they’re more incidental compared to the others with Xenk only seen in a couple of action scenes and Simon casting a spell via a magic helm and giving a line of exposition about owlbears. Edgin gives off the sort of smarmy charm reminiscent of a slightly less egotistical version of Chris Pine’s turn as Captain Kirk from the rebooted Star Trek films. If I haven’t made it clear, Michelle Rodriguez steals the trailer for me and I cannot wait to see more of Holga’s pure badassery and deadpan snark. Despite getting a lot of screentime in the trailer, we don’t see a whole lot of Doric’s character as her biggest roles outside of the wildshape owlbear rampage is poking holes in Edgin’s patter during her recruitment scene.

The most important part of an ensemble cast is the chemistry between characters but it’s also one of the hardest parts to convey in a trailer since there’s not a lot of time to establish relationships or raport. The only characters that really interact with one another are Edgin, Holga, and Doric (excepting the one owlbear line from Simon). However, what little we do get to see works as Edgin and Holga feel like old friends who know one another well and Doris plays well against Elgin’s charm by being mostly unaffected by it and surgically striking at his line of self-aggrandizing bull.

DisplacerCube.png

The effects are the most difficult to judge as many of them are obviously unfinished. The acid breath from the dragon looks more like tar as finishing touches to make it more obviously acidic haven’t been added yet, and the second time the owlbear shows up for a split-second diving at the camera feels like it’s lacking fine details. Some scenes that feel like they should be crowd scenes are rather empty indicating more characters will be composited in later. However, what effects are present are solid with the CGI even at this early stage blending well into the live-action footage. The digital matte shots of Neverwinter and the Underdark already looking amazing, combining the fantastic elements in realistic way so they match the feel of the other obviously real-world location sweeping landscape shots rather than looking like a video game cutscene.

Bearowl-sm.gif

Now for the owlbear in the room: How accurate is it to the Dungeons & Dragons game? Already people are talking about the fact druids in the rules can’t wildshape into an owlbear. First off, who cares it looks friggin’ awesome. Second, does anyone really think Wizards of the Coast isn’t going to release a tie-in product capitalizing on the cross-promotion with a new Druidic Circle with exactly that ability? Besides, a film is an adaptation. Just like changes are necessary when adapting from a novel to a film, some changes will need to be made to adapt from a game to a film. The important thing is that the changes made still fit within the tone and theme of the original material. Based on what’s available in the trailer, it appears the directors took great care in translating the stat blocks into the new medium.

Overall, the trailer manages to pack a lot into just over two minutes. There are still some rough patches and the film’s plot isn’t that well defined beyond the simple premise of “Baddie has a MacGuffin, must stop Baddie or world ends”. But there’s still plenty of time before the March 2023 release for the rough edges to receive a polish and more details to emerge allowing audiences to get a better idea of what to expect.

EdginHop.gif
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Darryl Mott

Darryl Mott


log in or register to remove this ad

billd91

Not your screen monkey (he/him)
People were damn insistent during the playtest that, for the sake of internal consistency, wild shape must use the monster manual stats for whatever you shapeshifted into. Because of that, I think WotC decided to be very restrictive with the qualifications for wild shape eligibility, to avoid unintended interactions with any later-printed monsters.
If there was a major demand to pull stats from the Monster Manual, it wouldn't surprise me if that was a reaction to Pathfinder's method of wild shaping, which is largely based on the PC's physical stats regardless of the animal transformed into. It's pretty tightly controlled and you never have to worry about the animal's stats being unbalancing, but it does kind of suck for a relatively weak druid to turn into a gorilla (or any other creature reputed to be strong) only to be a wee bit stronger than before they transformed.

That said, the early rounds of D&D Next's druid class's wildshaping ability did suck. It was far too restrictive. Both the PF and final 5e versions are better even if they produce somewhat different results.
 

Charlaquin

Goblin Queen (She/Her/Hers)
If there was a major demand to pull stats from the Monster Manual, it wouldn't surprise me if that was a reaction to Pathfinder's method of wild shaping, which is largely based on the PC's physical stats regardless of the animal transformed into. It's pretty tightly controlled and you never have to worry about the animal's stats being unbalancing, but it does kind of suck for a relatively weak druid to turn into a gorilla (or any other creature reputed to be strong) only to be a wee bit stronger than before they transformed.
I think it was more likely a response to 4e’s version of wild shaping, but yeah, same idea.
That said, the early rounds of D&D Next's druid class's wildshaping ability did suck. It was far too restrictive. Both the PF and final 5e versions are better even if they produce somewhat different results.
I don’t really remember what the early playtest wild shape was like, but I don’t remember being bothered by it. Though, I don’t think anyone in my playtest group played a druid. I’ll have to look at my old files again.
 



Levistus's_Leviathan

5e Freelancer
He’s doing a really bad job at not spoiling the fact that his character is some kind of monster in disguise too.
Yeah. I'm guessing he's a metallic dragon, but he might be one of the Red Wizards with Disguise Self or something like that.

My guess is that they didn't give him a good enough warning on what specifically not to say. The rest of the cast seemed to know what to shy away from, but he seemed a bit oblivious.
 

pukunui

Legend
Yeah. I'm guessing he's a metallic dragon, but he might be one of the Red Wizards with Disguise Self or something like that.

My guess is that they didn't give him a good enough warning on what specifically not to say. The rest of the cast seemed to know what to shy away from, but he seemed a bit oblivious.
Seeming a bit oblivious is his schtick.
 

Abstruse

Legend
Also, Hugh Grant hasn't exactly been in a lot of genre films. It's a bit hard to spoil a romantic comedy. "So when the two main characters get together in the end-- Oh drat, I wasn't supposed to let that out!" As far as I'm aware, this is his first big franchise genre film or series (I'm pretty sure he's the only actor in all of the United Kingdom who managed to escape Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings/The Hobbit, and Game of Thrones) and the closest he came was being the final punchline in a Doctor Who comedy sketch for Red Nose Day back in the 90s. Meanwhile the rest have been involved in that sort of film - Star Trek, Wonder Woman, It, Fast and Furious, even Bridgerton you'd have to watch spoilers doing promotion since it's a soap opera style Regency serial. Plus literally every question I've seen asked of Hugh Grant is details about his role which so far we don't even know the character's last name for sure (most of the recent press has Forge Fitzwilliam but the original press releases said Forge Fletcher). And even then there's been leaks. So I think it's less he doesn't know and more he's not used to doing press for this sort of film and the rest of the cast have his back to keep him from accidentally breaking NDA.
 



Remove ads

Remove ads

AD6_gamerati_skyscraper

Remove ads

Upcoming Releases

Top