Pineapple Express: Someone Is Wrong on the Internet?

[Whizbang Dustyboots]

A new Quinns Quest is out!

Will this be:
A) a game where I immediately spend money I don't have on a game that I'm now super-excited about or
B) a game where I go "good lord, no, although I can certainly see it's interesting."

We'll find out!

 

[overgeeked]

A new Quinns Quest is out!

Will this be:
A) a game where I immediately spend money I don't have on a game that I'm now super-excited about or
B) a game where I go "good lord, no, although I can certainly see it's interesting."

We'll find out!

I’m watching it now. This game looks perfect for me. I can’t wait for the physical release.

ETA: The Kickstarter landing page is already up.

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/gauntlet/public-access-analog-horror-mystery-ttrpg

 

[Whizbang Dustyboots]

If the only person who's agreeing with your points is the village idiot, it's probably time to pause and reconsider.

 

[trappedslider]

the newest addition to my growing collection

The inner sleeves

 

[trappedslider]

 

[Scribe]

--

Plumber in my house all day, I just want to work out, but I'm going to be training on 2 protein bars, all day.

 

[pukunui]

I'm currently working on converting the D&D 3.5e Eberron adventure Eyes of the Lich Queen to revised 5e, and I'm noticing all sorts of little terminology discrepancies in the 2025 Monster Manual stat blocks that I didn't really notice before. It's irksome - it's obvious different people wrote different stat blocks using slightly different wording for matching/similar abilities and then no one bothered to go through the book and edit them for consistency.

So, for instance, you get the Ghast and the Ghast Gravecaller, which are one after the other in the book. But the ghast has an ability that reads "If the target is a non-Undead creature ..." while the Ghast Gravecaller's version of that ability reads "If the target isn't an Undead ..."

More irksome are all the spellcasting creatures that get Bonus Actions, Reactions, and/or Legendary Actions that let them cast a spell "using the same spellcasting ability as Spellcasting", which is clunky and silly, but then whoever wrote the dragons just went with the more cleaner and clearer "uses Spellcasting to cast ..." instead.

I really wish WotC had put the effort into doing a proper editorial polish on the revised rules!

/rant

 

[trappedslider]

the newest addition to my growing collection


The inner sleeves
View attachment 429773

i low key kind of want to frame the inner sleeves and hang them up

 

[Dannyalcatraz]

I really wish WotC had put the effort into doing a proper editorial polish on the revised rules!

Editing- in all forms- is underappreciated. So are continuity bibles.

I remember running into a particular editing/continuity issue in 3.5: two very different feats with the same name. Most people seeing the subsequently published feat would assume- because of WotC’s own precedents- that the latter was a revision & replacement of the former.

But they were so different that it bugged me.* So I contacted CustServ. They informed me that the new feat was NOT a revised version of the former- the name was merely a mistake that made it past the editors.




* I was running a PC with a major shtick that depended on the older feat.

 

[prabe]

View attachment 429786

I like my pic better. (Yes, it's really my pic.)