No More Reptiles with Boobs!

Complaint: "If it's a reptile, I want it to look like a reptile!"

Response (half a dozen times): "It's not a reptile!!!"

Complaint: "If it looks like a reptile, it must be a reptile!" (Repeat.)

Sheesh. I like verisimilitude as much as the next guy, but this faux-fantasy-realism dressed up in pseudoscience is ridiculous.

Can you imagine a scientist in a D&D world? "I wonder why things fall to the ground." "Because Pelor decreed it so." "Oh. Guess I'll take up baking."
 

log in or register to remove this ad

If you want something female that looks like a woman then there are plenty of options.

If you want to play a reptile then play a reptile.

Getting huffy about it does not change the fact that reptiles are not mammals, that dragons are typically not considered mammals, and that mammals are the things that get (wait for it) mammaries.

Not even all primates get the version that human females are adorned with, why should a digitigrade reptile? Yelling 'I want boobies!' is not, in my opinion, a cogent argument for anything other than your own games.

The default... I would prefer reptiles, not human actresses with scaled latex appliances.

The Auld Grump
 

If you want something female that looks like a woman then there are plenty of options.

If you want to play a reptile then play a reptile.

Getting huffy about it does not change the fact that reptiles are not mammals, that dragons are typically not considered mammals, and that mammals are the things that get (wait for it) mammaries.

Not even all primates get the version that human females are adorned with, why should a digitigrade reptile? Yelling 'I want boobies!' is not, in my opinion, a cogent argument for anything other than your own games.

The default... I would prefer reptiles, not human actresses with scaled latex appliances.

The Auld Grump

one wonders if you have read about 4e dragonborn, their fluff does state that they nurse their young. Dragonborn are not reptiles.
 

one wonders if you have read about 4e dragonborn, their fluff does state that they nurse their young. Dragonborn are not reptiles.
In honesty - the dragonborn do not interest me at all, so I have not read anything on them.

If I had then I would be annoyed by that depiction, shrug, then go on ignoring them.

The Auld Grump, going back to ignoring the imitation draconians....
 

If you want something female that looks like a woman then there are plenty of options.

If you want to play a reptile then play a reptile.

um DB are not reptile, they do not have that key word (look at kobolds and lizardfolk)

Getting huffy about it does not change the fact that reptiles are not mammals, that dragons are typically not considered mammals, and that mammals are the things that get (wait for it) mammaries.
Um dragonborn are not dragons or reptiles...so um I am lost here.

Not even all primates get the version that human females are adorned with, why should a digitigrade reptile? Yelling 'I want boobies!' is not, in my opinion, a cogent argument for anything other than your own games.

but aren't you just yelling "I don't want boobies"?

The default... I would prefer reptiles, not human actresses with scaled latex appliances.
I disagree, I belive the lady does as well.

edit: For what it is worth if you put two minis down, one smaller and lighter frame the other bigger and with more flair (Tail, feathers, horns what ever) and asked me, I would guess the bigger showerer one was the guy. so I would never have guessed that mini was a chick.
 

I agree with a couple points there:

@GMforPowergamers
1. Apparently dragonborn aren't dragons, or even reptiles. I suppose that explains the potential for mammaries, but it doesn't explain why they look like dragons or lizards.

Either I'm taking issue with them being dragon or reptile creatures with breasts, or I'm taking issue with them being mammals that look like dragons and use the name.

2. I would also have assumed the female would have been the thinner of the lizard people, not the larger one.

Here's the "disagree"-points:

1. Yelling "I don't want boobies": We're saying we want our bipedal animal people to be more like the animals they resemble or emulate.

That means we want our lizardfolk like lizards, our miscellaneous dragonfolk like dragons, and our spotted hyena folk (gnolls) like spotted hyenas.

We dont want humans in latex appliances, but instead want animal-people.

I think I agree with AuldGrump about pretending the Dragonborn Don't exist. This thread has made me like them less than I did before. I thought it was just bad art. Apparently the whole premise bugs me.

Though Dragonkin are better than Draconians.

[Edit] And I found those offended lizards.

50732d1326513432-no-more-reptiles-boobs-d-d-lizard.jpg
 

Attachments

  • D&D Lizard.jpg
    D&D Lizard.jpg
    383.9 KB · Views: 651

I don;t care how much I disagree with you...that is funny

And its still obvious that the top one is female and the bottom is male. that is actually the case.

And yes, they are different kinds of lizards, and I did intentionally choose a bearded dragon for the male. Point is you can make the gender obvious without ape parts.

Also, I thought it would be funny. Glad the humor was appreciated. :)
 

And its still obvious that the top one is female and the bottom is male. that is actually the case.

And yes, they are different kinds of lizards, and I did intentionally choose a bearded dragon for the male. Point is you can make the gender obvious without ape parts.

Also, I thought it would be funny. Glad the humor was appreciated. :)



Yea it is so great that 2 men can laugh at the woman wanting equal treatment (the male dragon born look male to the untrained eye). By the way how am I supposed to tell who is male and who is female in those pics (not withstanding you telling me)
If non human males had curves like a woman, and breasts like a woman, and whore high heels how many players would be happy?
Once again the men look like men and the woman look like woman, but you want men to look like men (except for parts that you won’t see), and women to look like men.
 


Once again the men look like men and the woman look like woman, but you want men to look like men (except for parts that you won’t see), and women to look like men.
Not at all. I want the animal creatures to not mimic apes, but instead be /bipedal/ versions of the animal they're made to resemble.

As for the male dragonborn looking like men, you'll notice if you reread it that i criticized the male dragonborn as well, for having bulging chest muscles, and "external genitalia".

And "how can you tell, with the lizard photos?" True if you don't know the lizards it wouldnt be all that obvious, but the bearded dragon has the beardy spine things, and darker coloration, and the female gecko has lighter skin, bigger eyes, spines that look like eyelashes, and a more feminine looking face shape.

In a fantasy race, making the males look like the more masculine looking lizard and the females look like the more feminine looking lizard would be good enough, perhaps with a bit of a size difference if it wasnt obvious enough for you. That would be great. And they'd both have lizard-shaped bodies. Not rippling schwarzenegger chest muscles or pamela anderson boobs, and yet, it would still be obvious.

The men should look like (whatever the males of that animal look like) and the women should look like (whatever the females of that animal look like). In some cases that results in bigger, scarier females than males, like with Hyenas. and thats perfectly cool.

In many animals the difference is less noticeable than in humans. In some the differences are bigger.

Consider this image.

270px-Male_and_female_pheasant.jpg


If there were Pheasant people in D&D, I'd expect the women to be smaller, and have the female coloration, and the men to be larger with the vibrant colors.

I would be irritated by it if either one had a human face, I'd be irritated by if they shaped the female Pheasant like a female human, just like I'd be irritated by if the male was shaped like schwarzenegger.

I want them to look like pheasants, but more upright, possibly a little thinner, with longer legs. Still shaped like birds.

Another:
terp5a.jpg


If there were turtle people designed to look like this type of turtle, I'd want the women to be considerably larger, the men smaller and leaner, and both to have the fairly distinctive heads and faces; Additionally, the men would have those ridges on the shell, and the females wouldn't. In fact, the male would likely be a size-category smaller.

But have them stand on two legs, give them opposable thumbs, and maybe make them a bit thinner in the waist to explain how they balance standing upright.

I would want them to look like turtles. Not like men, not like women, turtles.

And yes, I picked particularly sexually dimorphic animals. If I were using less sexually dimorphic animals, I would have them stay looking similar, and maybe alter the face of whichever gender is less aggressive to look softer, with slightly bigger eyes, and less angular.

If it were crocodiles (Harder to tell apart) You're looking at a thinner body and snout, less convex airhole for breathing in the women. in other words, I'd expect the male croc to basically just look like the female croc, but bigger. And not like a dude with a croc head, but like a croc on two legs.

But lets say we for some reason *need* to give them much more human shapes than that (I'd rather not, but say thats not optional)

And say we need to make female turtle people and male turtle people look like humans.

Females
Awful
Yuck
Still Pretty Bad
Tolerable, but not great.

Males
Not Great
Least Ridiculous one I found
Okay, but maybe too cartoony a style

And this one just looks adorable
 
Last edited:

Remove ads

Top