FrogReaver
The most respectful and polite poster ever
Are you saying 100% of all players will say no to that narrative? Because if not then doesn't that mean we can have that narrative?Players.
Are you saying 100% of all players will say no to that narrative? Because if not then doesn't that mean we can have that narrative?Players.
I'm saying its a divisive narrative that is highly likely to cause friction within a group (especially given that D&D players are still most likely to be geeks, the hereditary enemies of jocks). Also see, kender.Are you saying 100% of all players will say no to that narrative? Because if not then doesn't that mean we can have that narrative?
Such a weird path to get right back to one of the exact points i raised in my post just a bit earlier.I'm saying its a divisive narrative that is highly likely to cause friction within a group. Also see, kender.
Why does it matter? 5E is a lot bigger and less Grognardly than the community that got so weird about the Warlord in 4E.I think the biggest obstacle to this is less the superiority dice design and more the fundamental friction with non-magical healing.
If you add magic to a warlord, you get a bard. If you keep it non-magical, healing wounds is going to be a problem.
We'll hit another "Hit Points are purely narrative contrivance!" vs. "Hit Points are diegetic!" debate in about a page or two, I'd wager.
Which doesn't mean that WotC could never do a warlord, just that it would be difficult to do one with the non-magical healing that I'd wager many believe is core to a warlord's schtick.
I can't help but feel that's kind of annoying and unhelpful? Not as much as the 'Pathfinder has that' crowd but still. Not everyone is playing a game where A5E content is allowed.Marshal | Level Up
a5e.tools
A5e already has it and better deserves your money than WotC!
While I can see that could be a problem, you'll never know if that specific content would be allowed until you ask your DM.I can't help but feel that's kind of annoying and unhelpful? Not as much as the 'Pathfinder has that' crowd but still. Not everyone is playing a game where A5E content is allowed.
And I say this as someone who likes A5E and has an article in the July GPG.
2) it limits other players ability to roleplay their fighter or barbarian as a drill sergeant
Kobold Press is doing that with the Vanguard. They have a free preview PDF that showcases it off.
This seems like an odd, taking it personally deal. Narratively, if your muscle-head fighter offers tough love inspiration route.. the PCs can RP it however they want. Mechanically, it is sacrificing your own oomph (probably DPR) to give actions to others. You are not forcing actions, but you are gifting them, the players can take those gifts and crap on them if they want. Sorry, that you had that experience however.Players.