D&D 5E 20th level Sorcerer vs the world

If you have Sorcery Points, you are effectively a Sorcerer, you are pure blood and deserve Power. :D
If you cast spells from the wizard list, you are effectively a wizard. Maybe you should have studied harder.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

If you cast spells from the wizard list, you are effectively a wizard. Maybe you should have studied harder.

You use your sorcery points to improve your spells. You are effectively a Sorcerer who study wizardly.
Its harry potter.
:ROFLMAO:


The Bastion sees it proud "Only pure blood would be brave enough. Wizards always cowards."
 

You use your sorcery points to improve your spells. You are effectively a Sorcerer who study wizardly.
Its harry potter.
:ROFLMAO:
Or, you've figured out hacks.

I personally would have preferred they not publish feats that allow such quasi-multi-classing, myself, but it's really hard to argue that a character with 20 levels of wizard isn't a wizard.

You be you, though.
 

Or, you've figured out hacks.

I personally would have preferred they not publish feats that allow such quasi-multi-classing, myself, but it's really hard to argue that a character with 20 levels of wizard isn't a wizard.

You be you, though.
If you have Sorcery Points, you are a sorcerer, pure blood.
 




So, if you have a Sorcery Points, you are an accident.
Or, you can hack your magic, because you've spent long days and weeks and months and years figuring out how magic works, unlike the idiot savants who were (in some cases literally) struck by lightning.

It's pretty clear that with those feats, things like "sorcery points" and "superiority dice" and "invocations" and "fighting styles" have been to varying degrees divorced from class. As someone who's played, run, and enjoyed systems where characters weren't defined by classes the way they are in D&D, I'm philosophically OK with that.
 

Sorcerers are born with their latent power, if you somehow had access to Sorcery Points, you are effectively a Sorcerer.
The former is entirely dependent on world-lore, though it's mentioned as a possible path (not the only one) in the books.

As to the latter ... It's clear from Tasha's that having sorcery points is no longer dependent on being a sorcerer. Maybe it's a wizard who figured out how it's done; maybe it's a cleric with the abilities bestowed by their deity.
 

Or, you can hack your magic, because you've spent long days and weeks and months and years figuring out how magic works, unlike the idiot savants who were (in some cases literally) struck by lightning.

It's pretty clear that with those feats, things like "sorcery points" and "superiority dice" and "invocations" and "fighting styles" have been to varying degrees divorced from class. As someone who's played, run, and enjoyed systems where characters weren't defined by classes the way they are in D&D, I'm philosophically OK with that.
If at any point in your career, you have raised Sorcery Points to use, you are a Sorcerer.

The Bastion is proud, only a pure blood would be able to have courage. A Sorcerer
 

Remove ads

Top