Alter Self


log in or register to remove this ad


If sight-oriented abilities aren't the product of physical differences in the eye (more rods than cones, for example) or brain, then what are their origin?

A minute (cellular/microscopic/cannot be seen with the normal human eye difference) physical capacity.

This is why it is outside the scope of even shapechange to award this.

It's a slippery slope...

One should not do biology on fantasy monsters.
 

Magus_Jerel said:
A minute (cellular/microscopic/cannot be seen with the normal human eye difference) physical capacity.

This is why it is outside the scope of even shapechange to award this.

It's a slippery slope...

One should not do biology on fantasy monsters.
Three things:
(1) I was assuming that the caster would take the least radical transformation possible to achieve the new vision sense (Dwarf, Elf, etc.).
(2) I was responding to a message which inferred that such a sense could not be represented by a 'gross physical change' (I do know that there are other explanations).
(3) I was being argumentative.

#3 is kind of a reflexive response for me...

<volefisk>
 

1) I was assuming that the caster would take the least radical transformation possible to achieve the new vision sense (Dwarf, Elf, etc.).
(2) I was responding to a message which inferred that such a sense could not be represented by a 'gross physical change' (I do know that there are other explanations).
(3) I was being argumentative.

#3 is kind of a reflexive response for me...

1. So was I

2. That was why I said that such would be a minute physical change (as all of these "argumentative" posts seem to indicate)

3. Presumed you were playing devil's advocate - and answered the exact question you asked with the reason for "no".
 

Remove ads

Top