The Ubbergeek
First Post
It already exist as CN and LN, btw.
This I agree with.Derren said:I guess we will see:
Lawful Good
Lawful
Lawful Evil
Chaotic Good
Chaotic
Chaotic Evil
Good
Evil
Unaligned
This I don't. The whole concept of "Neutrality" has been removed. Which, IMO, is a good thing. It was always a stupid concept anyway. You can't be "neutral" as to anything. That's what rocks and other inanimate objects are. If you're alive (and have any motives at all) you have to be for something.Derren said:Basically neutral gets just renamed into unaligned.
The Ubbergeek said:It already exist as CN and LN, btw.
The Ubbergeek said:still, I think there remains a Zen, eastern ideas balance concept, in possibility,....
Irda Ranger said:This I don't. The whole concept of "Neutrality" has been removed. Which, IMO, is a good thing. It was always a stupid concept anyway. You can't be "neutral" as to anything. That's what rocks and other inanimate objects are. If you're alive (and have any motives at all) you have to be for something.
I'm still holding out hope that it's a typo.MaelStorm said:With the new Ampersand Sneak Attack! article, I was surprised to see the term "chaotic evil" mentioned again.
Agamon said:Seeing as how alignment is flavor now anyway, in my game it'll be good, evil and unaligned, regardless.