Jack Hooligan
Explorer
Wow, it just dawned on me he also worked on these two classics
Wow, it just dawned on me he also worked on these two classics ...
It's true...you did! I guess I got wrapped up in the Taladas discussion in the following post....It's funny, because even though I only skimmed his tremendous and varied body of work, those were two things I specifically called out!
"Arguably the best, simplest ruleset for D&D was B/X. Everyone remembers Moldvay, but Zab wrote the "X." But that's not all; anywhere you look, from Star Frontiers (Alpha Dawn) to Conan you see Zeb credited."
I tend to think D&D editions (and the designers associated with them) tend to be a lot like Bonds; people will always have a strong attachment to the Bond they grew up with, and while they can learn to appreciate (or even love) the current Bond, or a past Bond, there will always be that unshakable love for Roger Mo.... um, the edition you started with.
He has done some D&D 5E work for Kobold Press!
I'd be interested in learning more. 2e has always struck me as the least well designed version of D&D (Zeb Cook's hands were tied there admittedly) because it's a mismatch between a game that was designed for gritty dungeon crawling, a DMG that tries to point you to heroic fantasy, and an XP system where killing monsters is the only type of XP the party shares leading to a much more murder-happy game than even 1e. And Planescape, while a great setting appears to me to be an even bigger mismatch between rules and setting than the rest of 2e.
I'd be delighted to find out that I was wrong and that there's more to learn - but could you tease out some of how he was a great designer rather than just listing some of his products please.
The edition you first come to D&D has an enormous influence, no doubt. If someone said, "hey, do you want to run a BECMI campaign," I'd be all in.
The Bond I grew up with was Roger Moore, but my mom made sure that my brother and I knew that Sean Connery was the true one. I still think that, after the brooding brute of Daniel Craig, we need a return to the slick and charming, sometimes silly Roger Moore-style Bond.
I don't think we can ever go back to a "camp" James Bond.
It's hardly a new theory, but it's been pointed out that after Austin Powers, you can't tread that line anymore. It's a shame. The harder part is that, TBH, it's really hard to deal with the ... more problematic aspects of Bond from the past. The things that differentiate him from just another Jason Bourne/Ethan Hunt character (the drinking, the womanizing, the gambling, etc.) .... haven't aged that well.