Cool, I'd love to hear what from wotc is supporting that claim, can't help but notice that you didn't even try to provide so much as a single supporting reason. If you can't provide anything supporting the idea that address grimmgoose's assertion is "totally wrong", maybe try addressing my post 59 concerns he was responding to.
Failing that... Balmer once gave
At the time He was expressing the importance of catering to the highly specific needs of a tiny slice of Microsoft's customer base because the vast majority of both that slice in addition to their other customers depended so much on that slice. A while back Wotc stated to stockholders that they have a similar slice of 20% who are responsible for the lion's share of revenue, but thus far there has been vanishingly little that seems to have been done & trumpeted about for the needs of that 20%.
Cool, I'd love to hear what from wotc is supporting that claim, can't help but notice that you didn't even try to provide so much as a single supporting reason. If you can't provide anything supporting the idea that address grimmgoose's assertion is "totally wrong", maybe try addressing my post 59 concerns he was responding to.
Failing that... Balmer once gave
At the time He was expressing the importance of catering to the highly specific needs of a tiny slice of Microsoft's customer base because the vast majority of both that slice in addition to their other customers depended so much on that slice. A while back Wotc stated to stockholders that they have a similar slice of 20% who are responsible for the lion's share of revenue, but thus far there has been vanishingly little that seems to have been done & trumpeted about for the needs of that 20%.
Man I don't care about any of your allegory, and references. Just say what you mean instead of trying to make me jump through hoops to understand you. I refuse to watch any videos or follow links to earlier posts just to try and understand your point.
Most of the books released are for the DM. Yet you complain about an optional system the DM can let players use as if it's a slight against the DM. I want you to stop complaining that every player facing option is an insult to the DM.
I need no evidence cause it's just my opinion, which is why I said "I think"
I have a very simple Uncommon magic item solution that I've already planned. When my players build their Bastion, one of the things they can do is acquire/create a pair of Sending Stones that your "major domo/seneschal" has the twin to.
Perfect for long distance "orders" that are forced to be short and to the point, so you can be efficient and not bogged down by pleasantries.
I also have a magic item in my campaign that is a pair of magically-connected Journals that two people can use to communicate via writing.
