Paul Farquhar
Legend
I was only talking about tieflings.With tieflings, that's definitely the case. I'm not so sure about dragonborn.
I was only talking about tieflings.With tieflings, that's definitely the case. I'm not so sure about dragonborn.
They don't care.Do these people not realize there are CURRENTLY two party based DnD novels going on (Dragonlance and Drizzt)?
I honestly think they missed the mark by trying to force the issue, here. Half-dragons were the most popular of the 3e "dragon men" types, and they had a very different aesthetic and story from dragonborn. Also they may have tried to hit those last points in 4e, but in 5e they certainly don't have a unique culture, society, or mechanical niche.
That does summon up the often soulless, substance free style of the D&D team.4e Dragonborn were awesome and their history tied in with the history of 4e Tieflings in a way that elevated them both. 5e, in its typical fashion, copied the aesthetics of 4e Fragonborn and 4e Tieflings, without preserving the real substance. But, hey, it worked out, they’re both as popular as ever if not even more popular.
The notion goes back to 2E as I recall. (Maybe older than that, but 2E was where I first encountered it.)This is a variant rule available in 5e. Faith in philosophies or broad causes can be enough.
That was my guess from the trailer.I believe the movie is a good illustration of why the novel's approach of imply, don't show is more effective.
There's also "sexy Tiefling!"Well, no. There's more than two archetypes in play with Tiefling.
There's also "sexy Tiefling!"