Laugh-ing-Coffin
Villager
This post is a year old and I'm still sharing my opinion. No the ranger class has never been necessary, they originally belonged as a subclass for the rogues. But people wanted more combat damage potential and a survival and tracker niche which they couldn't justify with just one or two subclass so they made it its own class... Now the rogues have scout as a subclass to kinda fill that rogue gap but it's meh in my opinion compared to the original rogue ranger subclass.Ranger and Rogue fullfill the same niche that I have had legendary game designers argue that Robin Hood is a rogue.
If the paragon of ranger is not your class, it is extraneous.
Rogue now covers the skirmisher concept so I would be okay of folding the ranger abilities into it and the stereotypes as sub classes.
Then again my favorite ranger was the 4e version, because i have always preferred the deepwoods sniper version for my rangers.
So I'm asking.
Is the Ranger a necessary Class?