Sure, but right now people are making decisions between protecting half as many people and reserving enough for a 2nd dose for everyone.
If we are at all certain we need 2 doses to generate immunity, reserving half makes sensr.
If we are not, then relying on supply chains (which can fail) to deliver the 2nd dose is the winning move.
I am saying it is very likely we get near full protection before the 2nd dose, and it is even plausible that the 2nd dose might be not needed; this is only plausible, and relying in it is a bad idea outside of emergencies.
OTOH, with thatbeing plausible, it would mean getting doses into people's arms even if we cannot guarantee 95%+ second dose tracking is a good plan.
But if there was a randomized trial to get only 1 dose, starting today, and track who gets covid 19, I'd enroll.
Vaccinating 7 billion people is a serious logistcal challenge. The possibility of doing it with.only 1 injection would make it insanely easier.
If we are at all certain we need 2 doses to generate immunity, reserving half makes sensr.
If we are not, then relying on supply chains (which can fail) to deliver the 2nd dose is the winning move.
I am saying it is very likely we get near full protection before the 2nd dose, and it is even plausible that the 2nd dose might be not needed; this is only plausible, and relying in it is a bad idea outside of emergencies.
OTOH, with thatbeing plausible, it would mean getting doses into people's arms even if we cannot guarantee 95%+ second dose tracking is a good plan.
But if there was a randomized trial to get only 1 dose, starting today, and track who gets covid 19, I'd enroll.
Vaccinating 7 billion people is a serious logistcal challenge. The possibility of doing it with.only 1 injection would make it insanely easier.