I'm saying that any book's popularity rises and falls over time and that D&D sent a lot of people out to buy the LOTRs in the late 70's and 80's. Just like the movies no doubt sent people out to buy the books. I'm not saying Tolkien was unheard of prior to D&D. I am saying it popularized it with my generation a lot.The idea that D&D popularized Tolkien is wild, indeed.
How old are you, if you don't mind me asking?I'm saying that any book's popularity rises and falls over time and that D&D sent a lot of people out to buy the LOTRs in the late 70's and 80's. Just like the movies no doubt sent people out to buy the books. I'm not saying Tolkien was unheard of prior to D&D. I am saying it popularized it with my generation a lot.
How old are you, if you don't mind me asking?
I am 50 this year, and we were assigned The Hobbit in 5th grade. We also had the Bashki Hobbit and Return of the King movies on television when I was a kid.
That said, my parents were both fantasy and sci-fi fans so in my household I never had to "discover" Tolkien.
I don't know. I think mutually understood definitions of terms allows us to have fruitful conversations, rather than descending immediately to name calling.Technically no, because there is neither steam powered technology, nor the punk theme of dystopian, street level urban rebellion, or anything that's specifically "steampunk." That said, your points are entirely valid, and nitpicking about labels is for losers. I voted yes.
Lots of people do think that, but they're wrong, unless their idea of "fruitful conversations" is interminable purity spiraling about semantics. I knew what he meant by "steampunk". The fruitful conversation is to be had by engaging what he meant rather than devolving into pedantry about the label he used.I don't know. I think mutually understood definitions of terms allows us to have fruitful conversations, rather than descending immediately to name calling.
That is interesting. You "knew what he meant" but still answered in the negative. Huh.Lots of people do think that, but they're wrong, unless their idea of "fruitful conversations" is interminable purity spiraling about semantics. I knew what he meant by "steampunk". The fruitful conversation is to be had by engaging what he meant rather than devolving into pedantry about the label he used.