D&D Movie/TV DADHAT becomes Netflix Global Hit

That's also good point. Run times for blockbuster movies have gone up. Quick google search shows there are now less sub 100 min movies, and way more 150+ min movies than it was in the 90s and 00s. When you add 15-20 min of extras before movie (teasers, commercials, phone warnings) in cinema, it makes long movies even longer.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Yeah, I pretty much never bother with food/drinks at theatres. Doubles the ticket price easy.

I used to pay attention to a local cinemas 5$ Wednesdays. They'd be classic movies or current movies that are a few weeks after release, I should have another look at them.
I have to get a giant cherry coke and see if I have the fortitude of bladder to make it through the movie.

I like that theaters are leaning more on older movies. Supposedly it's more profitable for them. I've gotten to see some of my favorite movies that were in theaters long before I was even born.. Blazing Saddles, Animal House...
Being able to pause on demand is a large reason why I feel James Cameron is out of touch. With the second avatar movie he talked about how, since people binge watch tv shows they can sit through a 3 hour movie, completely missing the point around how people watch shows at home. Also, I found avatar 2 super boring, only made it through an hour.
This is part of the reason I really like theaters. I struggle to force myself to pay attention to movies at home. I get distracted by my phone, or playing with the dog, or any other number of things. At the theater however, I don't have those distractions.
That's also good point. Run times for blockbuster movies have gone up. Quick google search shows there are now less sub 100 min movies, and way more 150+ min movies than it was in the 90s and 00s. When you add 15-20 min of extras before movie (teasers, commercials, phone warnings) in cinema, it makes long movies even longer.
This irks me a lot. There used to just be trailers.. Maybe a coke commercial.. Now there are more ads than trailers. The most recent film I've seen in theaters was Deadpool & Wolverine, and even that was over 2 hours.. Comedy/Action flicks used to always be like tight 90 minutes.
 

No idea what the article says, but my assumptions are that it's a fun movie (I saw it, I know this is true) that was released at a bad time. I think Mario brothers was on at the same time, money was tighter so people were quite possibly picking what to watch and honour among thieves missed out.
Not even just that people were picking and choosing - when the Super Mario movie was released they bought up multiple screens at most cinemas, so anything else showing at the time got squeezed down to just a few screenings or pushed out entirely. There simply weren't enough tickets on sale to let the D&D movie make much more money at that point even if it had been getting sold out in the venues where it was still showing.
 

Not even just that people were picking and choosing - when the Super Mario movie was released they bought up multiple screens at most cinemas, so anything else showing at the time got squeezed down to just a few screenings or pushed out entirely. There simply weren't enough tickets on sale to let the D&D movie make much more money at that point even if it had been getting sold out in the venues where it was still showing.

That's a good point, DADHAT really had too little time to it's self, a sequel would do much better.
 


I would be shocked if Paramount didn't try to establish D&D as a theatrical brand by greenlighting a second film, now that the first one has done exceedingly well in the secondary video market. The D&D name as a film brand now has the word of mouth, so why not capitalize on it? After all... massive film properties usually just don't happen overnight. And since Paramount can't just keep leaning on the Stark Trek brand, they should take their cue from the Austin Powers franchise... the first film did fine but it wasn't a blockbuster since no one knew what this film was. But after everyone came around to it on cable and video... the second film had the name awareness to really blow up theatrically and become a franchise. The same can be true for Dungeons & Dragons.
 

I generally feel that movies were better when they actually had to ration the use of special effects.
This is very true. I find this especially true in potential D&D films, where things would look a whole heck of a lot better to me if they just actually cast size-appropriate actors for many of the various species, rather than trying to follow LotR's footsteps of using greenscreens and forced perspective on regular-sized people to "shrink" them.

Hey studios... you mean to tell me you can't find actual people who are around 4' or slightly less to play gnomes, halflings, and goblins in the film, and actors around 4'6" to 4"9 to play dwarves? Invariably these types of characters are not used as principals in the film anyway, so it's not like you need acting talent the likes of Meryl Streep to cast them in smaller parts. Save yourself the money on special effects and actually find and cast actors of shorter stature to portray the smaller species in the movies.
 

It's getting noticed by media who only pay attention to Netflix when it got released on Netflix.

It's been popular on Paramount+ since release day
Nobody pays any attention to P+;)
It also sure didn't help that it released shortly after the OGL debacle so it had much less support from big DnD fans than it otherwise would've. Wasn't as much word of mouth praise when many of the biggest fans weren't too keen on singing even the slightest praise of WotC
I doubt this had any impact. It was due to being sandwhiched between John Wick 17 and Super Mario Brothers the blockbuster.
Movie theaters are a dying business model. The big screen is cool, but fewer and fewer people are willing to travel to an external location at a specific time and pay high ticket prices to watch a movie they could get on services they’re already paying for anyway. I’m also not sure about elsewhere, but where I live the aurora theater shooting made people a lot more hesitant to go to theaters and Covid killed what little desire remained. Going to the movies with a big group of friends for a blockbuster release used to be a frequent and exciting event, but it hasn’t felt that way for at least four years and realistically closer to six or seven, and the few times I have gone, there’s only ever a handful of other people there. It’s only a matter of time before streaming numbers eclipse box office sales as a metric for a film’s success, and it won’t be long after that before movie theaters go the way of video rental stores.
Yeap, folks have large screens and great sound systems plus internet to stream whatever they want, whenever they want. The theater experience needs to evolve.
It’s probably just me getting old, but it really feels like in-person social activities in general are slowly dying off.
I think its changing in ways that may not be appealing to older folk but not dying off.
I have to get a giant cherry coke and see if I have the fortitude of bladder to make it through the movie.

I like that theaters are leaning more on older movies. Supposedly it's more profitable for them. I've gotten to see some of my favorite movies that were in theaters long before I was even born.. Blazing Saddles, Animal House...

This is part of the reason I really like theaters. I struggle to force myself to pay attention to movies at home. I get distracted by my phone, or playing with the dog, or any other number of things. At the theater however, I don't have those distractions.

This irks me a lot. There used to just be trailers.. Maybe a coke commercial.. Now there are more ads than trailers. The most recent film I've seen in theaters was Deadpool & Wolverine, and even that was over 2 hours.. Comedy/Action flicks used to always be like tight 90 minutes.
This is one way to keep the theater going. Make it an event with something you cant simply do at home. Promote it like a social event too.
I would be shocked if Paramount didn't try to establish D&D as a theatrical brand by greenlighting a second film, now that the first one has done exceedingly well in the secondary video market. The D&D name as a film brand now has the word of mouth, so why not capitalize on it? After all... massive film properties usually just don't happen overnight. And since Paramount can't just keep leaning on the Stark Trek brand, they should take their cue from the Austin Powers franchise... the first film did fine but it wasn't a blockbuster since no one knew what this film was. But after everyone came around to it on cable and video... the second film had the name awareness to really blow up theatrically and become a franchise. The same can be true for Dungeons & Dragons.
Paramount has had a lot of struggles and I dont think they are in shape to roll the dice on sequel.
 

Hey studios... you mean to tell me you can't find actual people who are around 4' or slightly less to play gnomes, halflings, and goblins in the film, and actors around 4'6" to 4"9 to play dwarves? Invariably these types of characters are not used as principals in the film anyway, so it's not like you need acting talent the likes of Meryl Streep to cast them in smaller parts. Save yourself the money on special effects and actually find and cast actors of shorter stature to portray the smaller species in the movies.
I think it's kind-of frowned upon these days to choose people to play basically other species based purely upon their physical stature. "Oh, you're unusually short? Yeah, don't worry applying for the lead, you can be the garden gnome character."

One reason why they've changed the height restrictions on humans in the current ruleset.
 

I generally feel that movies were better when they actually had to ration the use of special effects.
I would have rather had a lower budget film with a group of PCs just starting out. Have them doing stuff that would be appropriate for levels 1-4. You could still have a dragon scene, followed by the party bravely running away. That, and there were scenes like the army fighting the black dragon that were just completely unnecessary. Cool looking, but unnecessary.
 

Remove ads

Top