there are quite a lot of doctors and other health care practitioners that are recommending it and other approaches for treatment.
Yes, but there are health care practitioners that recommend Reiki and homeopathy, too. My wife has watched a fellow veterinarian go down an anti-vax rabbit hole to the point of thinking the vaccines are part of a depopulation conspiracy. One medical practitioner, close to the previous US Administration, is quoted as thinking that
sex with demons was a primary cause of illness in the world.
Medical practitioners are human beings. They are subject to all the foibles of humans. And that includes tons of cognitive biases.
The processes of science are there to filter out those biases, and protect us from people who, for one reason or another, have gotten it wrong. If you aren't applying those filters, that's a problem.
It is not like ivermectin hasn't been studied, you know - it has, to date, failed to show appropriate results. So, when your medical professionals can come up with
statistically relevant results, we can talk. Until then, they can take a hike, as far as I am concerned.
Throwing around terms like "medical misinformation" in this day and age is tricky, because it depends upon who you are talking to. In the end, it comes down to who you trust, and what makes sense to you.
What makes sense to me is actually measuring results well enough to know that what you are doing works. If you trust something else, that's your problem.
I will not have this site be responsible for some poor gamer crapping out the lining of his intestine because we allowed unproven advice to proliferate.