Felnar said:
dont immediate actions count as your next turns swift action? So, it wouldnt matter what you've done in the past, because swift/immediate actions effect the future. The 5ft step as an immediate action (used not in your turn) would preclude you from moving until after your next turn.(your next turns actions cannot disallow a 5ft step).
So, if I 5' step during your turn, I can't move at all during my next turn. Let's say you go immediately after I do, and there are 14 other combatants between you and me. I take a 5' step during your turn, and now I need to remember that I did so until my next turn comes up, at which point I can't move and can't cast a quickened spell? Or a spell with 1 swift action casting time? Or any other swift action?
Alternatively, I can charge you, move my 2x my speed, and then, at any point after "the end" of my turn, take a 5' step.
I can't take a 5' step *during* my turn, because I moved, but I *can* take a 5' step as soon as your turn comes up - immediately following my own. That doesn't sound odd to you?
Also, if you're ditching the "is not an action" aspect of the 5' step (whereby it covers general shifting about while in combat), why are you retaining the "can't otherwise move" prereq?
I dont see how the current AoO rules require attention. On your turn you look at the miniatures, then act. Your actions (not your opponents actions) cause AoOs,
I think you missed my point. My actions draw AoOs against me. The opponents actions draw AoOs against
them. I can maneuver such that I force my opponents to provoke in order to perform their own maneuvers.
Accordingly, the AoO rules encourage me to pay attention already. I'm not sure the 5' as immediate action rule would cause me to pay more attention.
i guess it really needs to be a second type of immediate action so someone could 5ft step and featherfall or quickened-spell in the same round.
Which, to me, means that it is a far more complicated rule than should be realistically considered.